“葛兰西文化主导权理论”之误读

An analysis of misinterpretations on Gramscian cultural hegemony

文化主导权不只是关于文化的主导性探讨,且已成为多学科领域研究的热点。然而,一直以来学界对文化主导权的认识不仅具有争议,而且存在误读现象。通过文本细读法,作者试图归纳葛兰西文化主导权概念的内涵与演变,着重分析文化主导权理论的误读之处。这些误读现象主要体现在过度分化"霸权"理论,忽略文化、经济、政治学科内在关系的整体性;把葛兰西的主导权概念等同于意识形态思想灌输;把葛兰西之文化主导权等同于中文语境中霸权之义;过分抽象化葛兰西的文化主导权理论;"主导权"具有多向性而非单向性;直接把葛兰西的文化主导权理论提升到国际层面。

Cultural hegemony is not only about culture, but it is also a hotly debated interdisciplinary topic. Discussions about cultural hegemony have been controversial, and the concept itself is even misinterpreted from time to time. The article summarizes the interpretations and conceptual evolution of Gramscian cultural hegemony, and analyzes the misinterpretations on it. The authors claim that Gramscian cultural hegemony is oversplit without giving due attention to the interdisciplinary relevance;that it is conceived as ideological permeation;that it is regarded as the same meaning of Ba Quan in Chinese linguistic context;that it is interpreted in a very abstract way;that it has multidimensional rather than unilateral implications;and that it is also directly internationalized.