摘要
亚当·斯密以私有制为前提,通过分配理论论证了工人阶级贫困的原因。马克思通过对亚当·斯密分配理论的批判,认为工人贫困的根本原因在于现代劳动本身,马克思称其为异化劳动。异化劳动的产生有其历史必然性,但是由于异化劳动本身固有的缺陷,导致马克思无法对第四个规定进行解释。基于此,马克思开始在《詹姆斯·穆勒〈政治经济学原理〉一书摘要》中对私有制下私有财产的交换进行考察,在手稿中呈现出以劳资关系为中心的社会和以私有财产交换为中心的社会,并通过对这两种社会的批判,在第三手稿中提出了自己的社会概念。
Smith takes private ownership as the premise and demonstrates the causes of working class poverty through distribution theory. Marx criticizes the distribution theory and believes that the root cause of workers’ poverty lies in modern labor itself,which Marx calls alienated labor. The emergence of alienated labor has its historical inevitability,but because of the inherent defects of alienated labor itself,Marx was unable to explain the fourth provision. Based on this,Marx began to investigate the exchange of private property under private ownership in James Miller ’s Abstract of Principles of Political Economy.Therefore,in the manuscript,a society centered on labor relations and a society centered on the exchange of private property are presented. It is Marx’s criticism of the two that put forward his own social concept in the third manuscript.
出处
《湖南广播电视大学学报》
2019年第2期59-65,共7页
Journal of Hunan Radio and Television University