期刊文献+

股票市场波动丛聚性及杠杆效应的实证研究

Empirical Study on Volatility Clustering and Leverage Effect in Stock Market
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文选取1997年1月1日至2018年9月21日上证综指和标准普尔500指数日收益率序列,通过建立ARCH(1,1)模型对中美股票市场波动丛聚性进行实证分析,结果显示GARCH(1,1)模型能很好地刻画中美股票市场的波动丛聚性特征。建立非对称GARCH模型来刻画中美股票市场的杠杆效应,实证结果表明,中美股票市场都存在杠杆效应,即利空消息比利好消息对股市的冲击更大,并且美股市场杠杆效应明显强于中国股票市场。本文对中美股票市场波动丛聚性及杠杆效应进行比较分析,提出了完善交易制度、加强应对系统性金融危机的能力及减少政府干预等政策建议。 GARCH(1,1) model, of which result worked well, was established to describe volatility clustering of the Shanghai Composite and S&P 500 indices, using the dataset from January 1, 1997 to September 21, 2018. Furthermore, the asymmetric GARCH Models were used to characterize the leverage effect in both China and the U.S. stock market. The empirical results show that there is leverage effect in both market, that is, bad news has a greater impact on the stock market than good news, and the leverage effect of U.S. stock market is significantly stronger than that in China. Finally, the paper made a comparative analysis of volatility clustering and leverage effect between China and U.S. stock market, and put forward some suggestions, such as perfecting the transaction institutions,strengthening the ability to deal with financial crisis and reducing intervention of the government.
作者 王彧婧 程京京 董子昂 Wang Yujing;Cheng Jingjing;Dong Ziang(Finance Department, Hebei Finance University, Baoding Heibei 071051;School of International Trade and Economics, University of International Business and Economics,Beijing 100029)
出处 《西部金融》 2019年第4期4-11,共8页 West China Finance
基金 河北省教育厅科技青年项目“河北省中小企业创新中风险投资与银行信贷联动效应研究”(QN2018223) 河北金融学院金融创新与风险管理研究中心开放基金项目“河北省金融支持农村一二三产业融合发展创新研究”(JDKF2016003)
关键词 GARCH模型 非对称GARCH模型 波动丛聚性 杠杆效应 股票市场 GARCH Model Asymmetric GARCH Models Volatility Clustering Leverage Effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献48

  • 1张宝平.基于GARCH族模型的深圳股市波动性分析[J].黑龙江对外经贸,2009(10):146-148. 被引量:1
  • 2祁斌,黄明等.机构投资者发展与市场有效性及稳定性研究[N].上海证券报,2005.12.23.
  • 3Fama, Eugene F. and G. William Schwert. Asset Returns and Inflation [ J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1977,5:115 - 146.
  • 4French, Kenneth R., G. William Schwert, and Robert F. Stambaugh. Expected Stock Returns and Volatility [ J ]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1987,19.3 - 29.
  • 5Harvey, Compbell R.. Time -varying Conditional Covariances in Tests of Asset Pricing Models [ J ]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1989,24 : 289 - 317.
  • 6Campbell, John Y. and Ludger Hentschel. No News is Good News: An Asymmetric Model of Changing Volatility in Stock Returns[J].Journal of Financial Economics, 1992,31:137 -167.
  • 7L.R. Glosten, R. Jagannathan and D. E. Runkle. On the Relation between the Expected Value and the Volatility of the Nominal Excess Return on Stocks[J]. Journal of Finance,1993,6:1779- 1801.
  • 8Bollerslev, T. and M. Melvin. Bid -ask Spreads in the Foreign Exchange Market: an Ecpirical Analysis[J].Journal of International Economics, 1994, 36:355 - 372.
  • 9Lewellen, Jonathan. The Time- series Relations among Expected Return, Risk, and Book - to - market[ J ]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1999, 54:5 -43.
  • 10Vassalou, Maria. News Related to Future GDP Growth as a Risk Factor in Equity Returns [ J]. Jounal of financial economics,2003, 68.47-73.

共引文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部