期刊文献+

基于多重验证的船舶水动力虚拟试验置信度评估方法(英文) 被引量:1

A Multiple Validation Based Methodology of Confidence Level Assessment for Virtual Test of Ship Hydrodynamics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 船舶水动力学领域中,数值水池虚拟试验结果的可信度是制约其应用与发展的关键因素之一。目前常用的CFD不确定度分析,经实践证明不完全适用于虚拟试验置信度评估,因而需要建立一种新的置信度评估方法,以确保针对“属性细分”后的一类问题,虚拟试验结果可信且达到工程实用精度要求。为此,文中提出了一种新的船舶水动力数值水池试验置信度评估方法,该方法的核心是“不确定度分析、最优解确认、大子样验证”三重验证流程,其中:不确定度分析基于正交试验设计、方差分析和统计推断理论;最优解确认基于正交试验设计的效应分析方法和残差最小原理;大子样验证则基于大量数值水池试验结果和相应模型试验数据的对比与统计分析。文中以船模阻力虚拟试验为例开展了实践,证明了该置信度评估方法的合理性和有效性。 A multiple validation based methodology of confidence level assessment for virtual test of ship model hydrodynamics is presented.The methodology is based on the procedure of uncertainty analysis,validation of optimal solution,validation by big sample data,in which the uncertainty analysis is based on orthogonal design and variance analysis methods and statistic inference theory,the validation of optimal solution is based on effect analysis in orthogonal design and principle of minimum deviation;the virtual test method is validated by statistical analysis of comparison with a large numbers of experimental data.The procedure is applied to practice with virtual test of ship model resistance,and the result shows that the methodology of confidence level assessment is reasonable and effective.
作者 吴乘胜 赵峰 沈泓萃 WU Cheng-sheng;ZHAO Feng;SHEN Hong-cui(China Ship Scientific Research Center,Wuxi 214082,China)
出处 《船舶力学》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2019年第6期643-659,共17页 Journal of Ship Mechanics
关键词 置信度评估 多重验证 虚拟试验 船舶水动力 confidence level assessment multiple validation virtual test ship hydrodynamics
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献46

  • 1杨仁友,沈泓萃,姚惠之.带前置导叶桨潜艇自航试验的数值模拟与自航因子预报[J].船舶力学,2005,9(2):31-40. 被引量:11
  • 2朱德祥,张志荣,吴乘胜,赵峰.船舶CFD不确定度分析及ITTC临时规程的初步应用[J].水动力学研究与进展(A辑),2007,22(3):363-370. 被引量:43
  • 3Guide for verification and validation in computational fluid dynamics simulation[K]. AIAA, G-077-1998.
  • 4Roache P J. Verification and validation in computational science and engineering[M]. Albuqureque, New Mexico: Hermosa Publishers, 1998.
  • 5Coleman H W, Stern F. Uncertainties in CFD code validation[J]. ASME J Fluids Eng., 1997, 119: 795-803.
  • 6Uncertainty analysis in CFD, uncertainty assessment methodology[K]. ITTC Quality Manual 4.9-04-01-02, 1999.
  • 7Uncertainty analysis in CFD, guidelines for RANS codes[K]. ITTC Quality Manual 4.9-04-01-02, 1999.
  • 8Uncertainty analysis in CFD, verification and validation methodology and procedure[K]. ITTC Quality Manual 7.5-03-01- 01, 2002.
  • 9Simonsen C D, Stern F. Verification and validation of RANS maneuvering simulation of ESSO Osaka: effects of drift and rudder angle forces and moments[J]. Computers and Fluids, 2003a, 32: 1325-1356.
  • 10Van S H, Kim J, Park I R, Kim W J. Calculation of turbulence flows around a submarine for the prediction of hydrodynamic performance[C]//Proc. $th Int. Cont. Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics. Busan, Korea, 2003.

共引文献64

同被引文献8

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部