期刊文献+

医学检验危急值合理设置的临床实践

Clinical Practice of Rational Setting of Clinical Laboratory Critical Value
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨科学合理设置危急值病种阈值和报警间隔时间,对危急值的发生率、临床干预率、干预成功率、不良结果发生率以及医疗安全相关指标的影响。方法:回顾分析我院2011年和2015年检验危急值数据,分析设置病种阈值和报警间隔时间对危急值的发生率、临床干预率、干预成功率、不良结果发生率以及急救成功率、不良事件、医疗投诉的影响。结果:对危急值科学合理设置病种阈值和报警间隔时间后,危急值发生率由2.1%下降至1.2%(P<0.05),临床干预率由89.6%上升至96.3%(P<0.05),住院急救成功率由89.8%上升至95.0%(P<0.05),同时不良事件数和医疗相关投诉数均显著下降(P<0.05)。但对危急值干预成功率、不良结果发生率以及急诊急救成功率无显著影响(P>0.05)。结论:对危急值科学合理设置病种阈值和报警间隔时间能提高危急值临床干预率,提高住院急救成功率,减少不良结果发生率,降低危急值发生率,降低不良事件发生率,降低医疗相关投诉。 [Objective] To explore the impact of scientific and reasonable setting of critical value threshold and alarm interval time on the incidence of critical value, clinical intervention rate, success rate of intervention, incidence of adverse outcomes and medical safety related indicators.[Method] Through the comparison of the 2011 and 2015 critical value data, we analyzed the setting of the disease threshold and alarm interval for the incidence of critical value, clinical intervention rate, success rate of intervention, adverse outcome rates and medical safety-related data such as first aid success rates, adverse events and medical complaints.[Result] When the critical value scientifically set the disease threshold and the alarm interval, the critical value decreased from 2.1% to 1.2%(P<0.05). The clinical intervention rate increased from 89.6% to 96.3%(P<0.05). The success rate of hospitalization first aid increased from 89.8% to 95.0%(P<0.05). The number of adverse events and medical related complaints decreased significantly(P<0.05).However, there was no significant effect on the success rate of critical value intervention, the incidence of adverse outcomes, and the success rate of emergency first aid(P>0.05).[Conclusion] Rational setting of disease threshold and alarm interval for critical value can improve the clinical intervention rate of critical value, the success rate of hospitalization, reduce the incidence of adverse outcomes, the incidence of critical values, the incidence of adverse events and medical related number of complaints.
作者 张勇军 陈君卿 李斐铭 陈侃侃 陈翔 ZHANG Yongjun;CHEN Junqing;LI Feiming;CHEN Kankan;CHEN Xiang(The People's Hospital of Dongyang' Zhejiang 322100,China)
机构地区 东阳市人民医院
出处 《浙江医学教育》 2019年第3期44-46,59,共4页 Zhejiang Medical Education
基金 浙江省卫生厅医药卫生一般研究计划(编号:184 2016KYA184)
关键词 病种阈值 报警间隔时间 危急值 临床干预率 disease threshold alarm interval time critical value clinical intervention rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献52

  • 1张真路,刘泽金,赵耿生,杨军,王文武,崔敏.临床实验室危急值的建立与应用[J].中华检验医学杂志,2005,28(4):452-453. 被引量:149
  • 2Chinese Hospital Association, Heping Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100013, PRC.CHA2007年患者安全目标暨主要措施[J].中国医院,2007,11(1):29-30. 被引量:56
  • 3叶应抚,王毓三,申子瑜.全国临床检验操作规程.3版.南京:东南大学出版社,2006:744-745.
  • 4Barenfanger J, Sautter RL, Lang DL, et al. Improving patient safety by repeating (read-back) telephone reports of critical information. Am J Clin Pathol, 2004, 121 : 801-803.
  • 5International Organization for Standardization. Medical laboratories:Particular requirements for quality and competence. ISO 15189. Geneva:ISO; 2007.
  • 6Lundberg GD. When to panic over abnormal values. MLO Med Lab Obs, 1972, 4:47-54.
  • 7Anand SD, Arjun R, Amanda BC, et al. Analysis of laboratory critical value reporting at a large academic medical centre. Am J Clin Pathol, 2006, 125:758-764.
  • 8Parl FF, O'Leary MF, Kaiser AB, et al. Implementation of a closed-loop reporting system for critical values and clinical communication in compliance with goals of the joint commission. Clin Chem, 2010, 56:417-423.
  • 9Wagar EA, Stankovic AK, Wilkinson DS, et al. Assessment monitoring of laboratory critical values: a College of American Pathologists Q-Tracks study of 180 institutions [ J. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2007, 131 (1) : 44-49.
  • 10Lundberg GD. When to panic over abnormal values [ R ]. MLD MedLabObs, 1972, 4 (1): 47-54.

共引文献177

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部