期刊文献+

关于《电子商务法》对滥用优势地位规制的适用研究 被引量:24

Applicable Research on the Regulation of Abuse of Dominance in the E-commerce Law
原文传递
导出
摘要 我国《电子商务法》第35条对电子商务平台经营者规定了不得滥用优势地位的义务规定,以规范电子商务市场的竞争行为。但是,第35条并没有对滥用优势地位的适用范围和违法标准进行清晰的界定,实践中可能导致该条款过度适用或者因缺乏可操作性而无法适用的问题。借鉴国外相关滥用优势地位规制的理论和实务经验,明确第35条的适用范围和违法条件,对于充分发挥《电子商务法》竞争规制条款的作用,促进我国电子商务发展和维护市场竞争秩序具有重要的意义。 Article 35 of China’s "E-Commerce Law" stipulates that e-commerce platform operators should not abuse their dominant position to regulate the competitive behavior of the e-commerce market. However, Article 35 does not clearly define the scope of application of the abuse of dominant position and the standard of violation. In practice, it may lead to the overuse of the clause or the inability to apply due to lack of maneuverability. Learning from the theoretical and practical experience of foreign related abuse dominant position regulation, clarifying the scope of application and illegal conditions of Article 35 is important for giving full play to the role of the competition regulation provisions of the "E-commerce Law", promoting the development of China’s e-commerce and maintaining market competition order. The meaning.
作者 戴龙 Dai Long
出处 《价格理论与实践》 北大核心 2019年第2期28-32,共5页 Price:Theory & Practice
基金 作者主持的国家社会科学基金一般项目"竞争政策视野下的互联网平台规制研究"(项目号18BFX151)的阶段性成果
关键词 电子商务 反垄断法 反不正当竞争法 相对优势地位 E-commerce Anti-monopoly law Anti-unfair competition law Comparative advantage
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献41

  • 1Schmalensee,R.Payment systems and interchange fees[J].Journal of Industrial Economics,2002,(50):103-122.
  • 2Rochet,J.and J.Tirole.Cooperation among competitors:some economics of payment card associations[J].RAND Journal of Economics,2002,(3):549-570.
  • 3Armstrong,M.Competition in Two-sided markets[R].IDEI,2004.
  • 4Caillaud,B.and B.Jullien.Chicken & egg:competition among intermediation service providers.Rand Journal of Economics,2003,(2):309-328.
  • 5Wright,Julian and Ulrich Kaiser.Price structure in two-sided markets:evidence from the magazine industry[R].Department of Economics,National University of Singapore,2004.
  • 6Evans,David S.The antitrust economics of two-sided markets[J].Yale Journal on Regulation,2003,(20):325-381.
  • 7Rochet,J.and J.Tirole.Two-sided Markets:an Overview[R].IDEI,Universite de Toulouse,2004.
  • 8Katz Michael and Carl Shapiro.Network externality,competition and compatibility[J].American Economic Review,1985,(2):424-440.
  • 9Roberto Roson.Two-sided market:a tentative survey[J].Review of Network Economics,2005,(2):142-160.
  • 10Wright,Julian (2004).One-Sided Logic in Two-Sided Markets.Review of Network Economics,3(1):44-64.

共引文献296

引证文献24

二级引证文献127

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部