期刊文献+

美国大学教师不当教学行为的分类研究 被引量:2

Study on the Classification of Improper Teaching Behaviors of American Faculty
原文传递
导出
摘要 大学教师不当教学行为会导致学生不当行为的产生,针对大学教师不当教学行为的研究是大学教学伦理的重要内容。20世纪90年代以来,大学教师不当教学行为在美国受到研究者的普遍关注。其中,大学教师不当教学行为的分类及其依据是研究大学教师不当教学行为的前提。美国学者将不当教学行为主要分为学生与教师两大视角,对于管理者视角下不当教学行为分类的研究仍有待加强,分类依据一定的理论、基于利益相关者视角,并主要使用了定量研究方法。防范不当教学行为,应重视对教师教学自由权的保护,加强对管理者视角下不当教学行为分类的研究,结合实际教学情境处理不当教学行为。 The improper teaching behaviors of the faculty may lead to students’ misbehavior. The research on the faculty improper teaching behaviors is an important content of the university teaching ethics. Since the 1990 s,the improper teaching behaviors of the faculty have attracted widespread attention of researchers in the United States. The classification and basis of the improper teaching behaviors of American faculty are the premise for the study on improper teaching behaviors of the faculty. American scholars divide improper teaching behaviors into two major perspectives: the student and the faculty. The research on the classification of improper teaching behaviors from the perspective of administrators needs to be strengthened. All kinds of classification are based on certain theoretical basis, the perspective of stakeholders as well as quantitative research methods. To prevent improper teaching behaviors, we should attach importance to protect faculty’s teaching freedom, strengthen the research on the classification of improper teaching behavior from the perspective of administrators, and deal with improper teaching behaviors in combination with the actual teaching situation.
作者 晁亚群 CHAO Yaqun(Institute of International and Comparative Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875)
出处 《比较教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第6期21-28,共8页 International and Comparative Education
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“大学教师职业伦理与行为规范的国际比较研究”(课题批准号:15JJD880004)的阶段性成果
关键词 美国 大学教师 不当教学行为 行为分类 the faculty improper teaching behaviors behavior classification
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献22

  • 1吴雪萍,刘辉.澳大利亚高等教育教学质量保障策略探究[J].比较教育研究,2004,25(9):71-75. 被引量:23
  • 2林杰.美国大学教师发展运动的历程、理论与组织[J].比较教育研究,2006,27(12):30-34. 被引量:41
  • 3Eble K E, McKeachie W J. Improving Under graduate Education through Faculty Development [M]. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass,1985 :11.
  • 4Austin A E. Theory, Practice and Implications : Professional and Organizational Development for Chinese Higher Education in the Global Context EC. Beijing= Beijing Normal University, 2009 : 6 - 10.
  • 5马骜.澳大利亚改善留学生体验的政策与实施研究[D].北京:北京师范大学教育学部,2015:14.
  • 6Allen E, Seaman J. Grade Change : Tracking On line Education in the United State ER. Sloan: Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Re- search Group, 2014:6.
  • 7Sloan Goes OnlineEEB/OL. (2014 - 07 - 07) E2015 - 09 - 081. https://www, insidehighcred. com/news/2014/07/07 / sloan-consortium- renames itself-online-learning-consortium.
  • 8Mission Statement of the Institute for Teaching and LearningEEB/OL. (2015 - 04 - 23)2015 - 09 - 081. http://www, calstate, edu/itl/.
  • 9李俐.英国高校教师发展研究[D/OL].重庆:西南大学教育学部,2013:74[2015-09-08].http:www.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail/aspx?QuerylD=42&curkec-I&recid=&filename=101326891.
  • 10Recognition of Prior Learning E EB/()L. ( 2015 04- 24)E2015 -09 - 101. http://www, cii. co. uk/ about/ accreditation-services/ accreditatiowschemes for-individuals/recognition of prior learning.

共引文献18

同被引文献17

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部