期刊文献+

管制放松后的企业竞争行动、竞争对手分类与销售绩效 被引量:10

Firm Competitive Action, the Category of Rivals and Sales Performance after Deregulation
原文传递
导出
摘要 基于亚洲14个国家(地区)电信企业的二手数据,本文检验了企业竞争行动与销售绩效之间的主效应,以及组内竞争和组间竞争对上述主效应的调节作用。研究发现,企业竞争行动密集性、异质性与销售绩效正相关,企业竞争行动简单性与销售绩效负相关;市场竞争(包括组内竞争与组间竞争)对企业竞争行动密集性、异质性与销售绩效之间的关系存在负向调节,对企业竞争行动简单性与销售绩效之间关系存在正向调节。从3个战略群组的对比看,在企业成员规模越小的战略群组中,组内竞争对企业竞争行动与销售绩效之间关系的调节效应越强;在企业成员规模越大的战略群组中,组间竞争对企业竞争行动与销售绩效之间关系的调节效应越强。上述结论表明,组内竞争对小企业最为不利,组间竞争对大企业最为不利。 Based on the second-hand data of the telecom firms in 14 Asian countries, we examined the main effects between competitive action and sales performance, as well as the moderate effect of Within-group rivalry and Betweengroup rivalry on the main effects. The results show that the intensity/heterogeneity of firm’s competitive action is positively related to sales performance, but the simplicity of firm’s competitive action is negative related to sales performance;Market rivalry(include Within-group Rivalry and Between-group Rivalry) has a significantly negative moderate effect on the relationship between the intensity/heterogeneity and sales performance;However, it has a significantly positive moderate effect on the relationship between the simplicity and sales performance. From the comparison of the three strategy groups, with the decrease in the size of firm members that constitute a strategic group, the moderate effect of Within-group Rivalry on the relationship between firm’s competitive action and sales performance is increase.On the contrary, with the increase in the size of firm members that constitute a strategic group, the moderate effect of Between-group Rivalry on the relationship between firm’s competitive action and sales performance is increase. The research findings show that: Within-group Rivalry has a more negative effect on small firms, Between-group Rivalry has a more negative effect on large firms.
作者 袁靖波 周志民 周南 周晨 Yuan Jingbo
出处 《管理世界》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第6期179-192,196,共15页 Journal of Management World
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(批准号:71702110、71832010) 中国博士后科学基金项目(批准号:2017M610550、2018T110893) 广东省普通高校省级重大项目(批准号:2016WZDXM006)的资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献139

  • 1汪克夷,冯桂平.基于市场信号的竞争反应预测[J].东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007,9(3):18-22. 被引量:9
  • 2田志龙,邓新明,Taeb Hafsi.企业市场行为、非市场行为与竞争互动——基于中国家电行业的案例研究[J].管理世界,2007,23(8):116-128. 被引量:66
  • 3辛清泉,林斌,王彦超.政府控制、经理薪酬与资本投资[J].经济研究,2007,42(8):110-122. 被引量:949
  • 4Eckenrod S. Incentive regulation in local telecommunications:The effects on price mark- ups[J]. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 2006,30(2) : 217- 231.
  • 5Kotakorpi K. Access price regulation,investment and entry in telecommunications[J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2006,24 : 1013- 1020.
  • 6Mussa M. ,Rosen S. Monopoly and product quality[J]. Journal of Economic Theory, 1978,18:301-317.
  • 7A. Young, 2000, "The Razorps Edge: Distortions and Incremental Reform in the People's Republic of China" , Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.115(4),pp.1091-11351.
  • 8Alonso, Dessien, Matouschek, 2008, "When Dose Coordination Require Centralization?" , American Economic Review, Vol.98(1),pp. 145-179.
  • 9Adler, P, 1995, "Interdepartmental Interdependence and Coordination: The Case of the Design/manufacturing Interface" , Organizational Science, Vol.6,pp. 147-167.
  • 10Benito, G. R. G., 2003, "Seen Through the Lens of International Business Strategy" ,Keynote Lecture at the International Conference on Divestment: Corporate Strategies, the Regions and Policy Responses, Lisbon.

共引文献308

同被引文献191

引证文献10

二级引证文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部