期刊文献+

我国金融借贷法律关系中的自然人保证制度——以自然人保证的书面要式规范为视角 被引量:6

Private Guarantee Device for Financial Loan Legal Relations in China: From the Perspective of the Writing Requirement for Private Guarantees
下载PDF
导出
摘要 自然人保证制度是补充借款人信用的重要制度。由于保证的特殊属性和自然人的特性,确保当事人审慎判断的制度设计非常重要,其中就包括保证合同的书面要式规范问题。我国现行保证制度对自然人保证人的保护力度较弱,其保证的书面要式规范也存在诸多问题,应遵循我国《担保法》及有关法律规范关于保证合同书面形式规定的立法宗旨,借鉴域外相关立法经验,强化保证合同的书面要式规范。针对自然人保证合同违反书面要式性的效力问题,应从完善电子合同保证书面方式、金融借贷保证合同的书面要件与自然人保证人的签章等方面,进一步完善我国自然人保证制度的书面要式规范。 Guarantee is an important device to supplement borrowers'credibility.Due to the special nature of guarantee and natural persons,it is important to design a system that can ensure the parties acting with prudence.This includes the writing requirement for guarantee agreements,as it has warning and preventive functions.In China,the current system of guarantee is insufficient to protect private guarantors,especially when it comes to writing as a requirement for the guarantees to be valid legal acts.In this regard,there should be compliance with the purpose of the Guarantee Law and its relevant regulations,and borrowings from foreign legislatures,to strengthen the writing requirement for guarantee agreements. On this basis,the article attempts to analyze the problems of effects,such as invalidity arising from violation of writing requirement, the cure by performance rule,the interpretation of vacuum in guarantee agreements.From the angles of improvement of the writing requirement for e-contracts,financial loan guarantee agreements,and signatures from private guarantors, it proposes a reinforcement of writing requirement to improve the system of private guarantee in China.
作者 薛夷风 XUE Yi-feng(School of Law,Xiamen University,Xiamen 361005,Fujian)
机构地区 厦门大学法学院
出处 《厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第3期147-156,共10页 Journal of Xiamen University(A Bimonthly for Studies in Arts & Social Sciences)
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目"网络金融犯罪的综合治理研究"(17ZDA148)
关键词 自然人保证制度 保证合同 书面要式性 private guarantee Device guarantee agreement writing requirement for valid legal acts
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献31

  • 1邵建东.论意思表示的解释[J].南京大学法律评论,1996(2):128-134. 被引量:4
  • 2[德]迪特尔·梅迪库斯 邵建东.德国民法总论[M].北京:法律出版社,2000..
  • 3[德]卡尔·拉伦茨 王晓哗译.德国民法通论(下册)[M].北京:法律出版社,2003.426.
  • 4Reinhard Zimmermann, The Law of Obligations - Roman foundations of the civilian tradition, Oxford University Press, 1996, pp. 82-89.p83.
  • 5[德]康拉德·茨威格特 海因·克茨.合同形式[J].中外法学,2000,(1):91-91.
  • 6Ernst Rabel, The Statute of Frauds and Comparative Legal History, 63 LQR, 1947,pp. 174 -178.
  • 7[德]海因·克茨 周忠海译.欧洲合同法(上卷)[M].北京:法律出版社,2001.123.
  • 8Wemer Flume, Rechtsgesch? fte, 1979, §15 Ⅲ 4c, aa.
  • 9梁展欣 王利明 奚晓明.合同法定形式论[A].王利明,奚晓明.合同法评论(第2辑)[C].北京:人民法院出版社,2004.108.
  • 10全国人大法制工作委员会民法室.《中华人民共和国合同法》立法资料选[R].北京:法律出版社,1999,10..

共引文献34

同被引文献65

引证文献6

二级引证文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部