期刊文献+

基于D-S证据理论的直觉模糊群决策信息集结方法 被引量:5

Intuitionistic Fuzzy Group Decision Making Information Aggregation Method Based on D-S Evidence Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在处理直觉模糊多属性群决策问题时,可根据D-S证据理论完成信息的集结。利用直觉模糊熵和模糊偏好关系确定权重,通过加权-证据融合的方法得到专家对方案集的融合证据。在专家信息集结方面,结合欧氏证据距离求解证据间的冲突度,得到专家权重,并将群体专家对方案集的证据信息进行修正和融合。最后结合算例证明了所提方法具有很高的实用价值。 When dealing with the intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute group decision-making problem,the information aggregation can be completed according to the D-S evidence theory.The weights are determined by using the intuitionistic fuzzy entropy and fuzzy preference relationship.Weighted-evidence fusion method is used to obtain the expert’s fusion evidence for the solution set.In the expert information aggregation,the Euclidean evidence distance is used to solve the degree of conflict between the evidences,and the expert weights are obtained.Evidence information of group experts on program sets are corrected and integrated.Finally,combined with examples,it is proved that the proposed method has high practical value.
作者 臧翰林 李艳玲 ZANG Han-lin;LI Yan-ling(Rocket Force University of Engineering,Xi’an 710025,China)
机构地区 火箭军工程大学
出处 《计算机科学》 CSCD 北大核心 2019年第B06期102-105,共4页 Computer Science
关键词 多属性群决策 D-S证据理论 模糊偏好关系 欧氏证据距离 冲突度 Group decision-making of multi-attribute D-S evidence theory Fuzzy preference relation Euclidean evidence distance Degree of conflict
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献64

  • 1孙海龙,姚卫星.区间数排序方法评述[J].系统工程学报,2010,25(3):304-312. 被引量:54
  • 2王坚强,孙超.信息不完全确定的多准则语言群体指派方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2006,28(6):877-880. 被引量:3
  • 3巩在武,刘思峰.不同偏好形式判断矩阵的二元语义群决策方法[J].系统工程学报,2007,22(2):185-189. 被引量:23
  • 4曹继平,宋建社,郭军,刘建平.一种战时装备维修保障资源优化调度算法[J].系统仿真学报,2007,19(15):3390-3394. 被引量:32
  • 5Guo J, Song J S, Yang M, et al. Multi-agent based resource reconfiguration framework in agile armament battlefield recovery system[C] // Proc. of International Workshop on Education Technology and Training & International Workshop on Geosciences and Remote Sensing ,2008:724 - 727.
  • 6Dempster A P. Upper and lower probabilities induced by a mul tivalued mapping[J]. AnnalsofMathematical Statistical ,1967, 38(4) :325 - 339.
  • 7Sharer G. A mathematical theory of evidence [M]. New Jensey: Princeton University Press, 1976.
  • 8Beynon M J. Understanding local ignorance and non-specificity in the DS/AHP method of multi-criteria decision making[J]. European J ournal of Operational Research, 2005,163 (2) : 403 - 417.
  • 9Beynon M J. A method of aggregation in DS/AHP for groupdecision-making with the non-equivalent importance of individuals in the group[J]. Computers & Operations Research ,2005,32 (7) :1881 - 1896.
  • 10Chen T L, Que P W. Target recognition based on modified combination rule [J]. Journal of S.ystems Engineering and Electronics, 2006,17(2), 279 - 283.

共引文献59

同被引文献48

引证文献5

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部