期刊文献+

分娩方式对剖宫产术后再次妊娠结局的影响 被引量:26

The influence of different delivery methods on the clinical outcome of repregnancy after cesarean section
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察不同分娩方式下剖宫产术后再次妊娠结局。方法选取2014年2月至2017年2月贵港市妇幼保健院收治的剖宫产术后再次妊娠产妇341例,观察产妇采用不同分娩方式后,产后出血、产褥感染、新生儿窒息等情况。结果选择剖宫产231例,经阴道试产110例,其中阴道分娩91例,试产成功率为82.73%,有19例试产过程中改行剖宫产;剖宫产组分娩24 h内阴道出血量和产褥感染率分别为(320.16±27.43)m L和10.40%,明显高于阴道分娩组(P<0.05);阴道试产成功组瘢痕厚度为(4.12±1.03)mm,明显高于试产失败组(P<0.05),而距上次剖宫产时间为(3.76±0.97)年,明显短于试产失败组(P<0.05);logistic回归分析结果显示瘢痕厚度是试产成功的影响因素(OR=0.457,P<0.05)。结论剖宫产术后再次妊娠产妇应根据自身情况选择分娩方式,如符合阴道分娩条件应首选阴道试产,阴道分娩产妇产后出血量及产褥感染较少,不会增加新生儿窒息的风险。 Objective To investigate the effect of different delivery methods on repregnancy after cesarean section.Methods 341 cases of repregnancy after cesarean section were selected from February 2014 to February 2017 in our hospital,of which the postpartum hemorrhage,puerperal infection,neonatal asphyxia,etc.were observed.Results 231 cases of cesarean section and 110 cases of vaginal trial were selected.Among them,91 cases of vaginal delivery,with 82.73%success rate,19 cases changed to cesarean section during the trial production.The amount of vaginal bleeding within delivery 24 h and puerperal infection rate in cesarean section were(320.16±27.43)ml and 10.40%,significantly higher than that in vaginal delivery group(P<0.05).The thickness of scar in the successful trial production group was(4.12±1.03)mm,which was significantly higher than that of trial failure production group(P<0.05).From the last cesarean section time was(3.76±0.97)years,significantly shorter than the trial failure production group(P<0.05).The results of Logistic regression analysis showed that the thickness of scar was the influential factor in the success of trial production(OR=0.457,P<0.05).Conclusion The mode of delivery were chosen according to the situation after cesarean sectionin pregnant women.If meet the conditions of vaginal delivery,vaginal trial production is the first choice,which with less postpartum hemorrhage and puerperal infection,will not increase the risk of asphyxia newborn.
作者 李少梅 张艳 何中慧 LI Shaomei;ZHANG Yan;HE Zhonghui(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Guigang Maternal and Child Health-Care Hospital,Guigang,Guangxi 537100,China;Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University,Nanning,Guangxi 530021,China)
出处 《安徽医药》 CAS 2019年第7期1441-1444,共4页 Anhui Medical and Pharmaceutical Journal
关键词 剖宫产 再次妊娠 分娩方式 阴道分娩 Cesarean section Repregnancy Delivery mode Vaginal delivery
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献222

  • 1颜建英,陈文祯,崔小妹.剖宫产后再次妊娠阴道分娩[J].实用妇产科杂志,2004,20(5):264-265. 被引量:177
  • 2汪萍,苏悦,周学勤.妊娠期妇女对分娩方式选择的调查分析[J].中国优生与遗传杂志,2006,14(5):80-81. 被引量:8
  • 3程志厚.剖宫产及相关问题[M].北京:北京出版社,1996:54.
  • 4何群双,杨云.前置胎盘期待疗法剖宫产时机的探讨[J].中国临床医生杂志,2007,35(8):40-41. 被引量:12
  • 5乐杰.妇产科学[M].6版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2003:354
  • 6Chang WC, Chang DY, Huang SC, et al. Use of three- dimensional uhrasonography in the evaluation of uterine perfusion and healing after laparoscopic myomectomy[J]. Fertil Steril,2009,92(3) :1110-1115.
  • 7Yokoi K. Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Japanese women[J]. Int J Med Sci,2012,9(6) :488-491.
  • 8Deline J. Low primary cesarean rate and high VBAC rate with good outcomes in an Amish birthing center[J]. Ann Faro Med, 2012,10(6):530 -537.
  • 9Spong CY, Landon MB, Gilbert S, et al. Risk of uterine rupture and adverse perinatal outcome at term after cesarean delivery[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2007,110 (4) : 801 -807.
  • 10Ananth CV,Smulian JC,Vintzileos AM.The association of placenta previa with history of cesarean delivery and abortion a meta analysis[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,1997,177(5):1071-1078.

共引文献848

同被引文献237

引证文献26

二级引证文献68

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部