期刊文献+

基于随机系数Logit模型的地铁拥挤度影响参数研究 被引量:3

Evaluation of the Metro’s In-vehicle Congestion Parameters Based on Random Parameters Logit Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 出行者对车内拥挤度的评价往往不一致,文中利用随机系数Logit模型对拥挤度影响参数进行研究.考虑到心理因素对出行者出行选择行为具有影响,文中研究加入了出行者对出行舒适性要求这一潜在心理因素,并通过问卷调查的方式进行分析.研究表明:随机系数Logit模型比传统的离散选择模型具有更高的拟合度;随机系数Logit模型的效用函数中,车票价格和车内时间的系数为非随机变量,但车内拥挤度的系数为随机变量,且受到出行者对出行舒适性要求和车内时间的影响,出行者对出行舒适性的要求越高,车内拥挤度对效用的影响越大,随着车内时间的延长,车内拥挤度对效用的影响减小. There is significant heterogeneity among travelers evaluation on in-vehicle congestion. The impact of in-vehicle congestion was studied with the random parameters Logit model. In view of the impact of the latent psychological factor on travelers mode choice, travelers demand of comfort was taken into account . The results show that the random parameters Logit model fit the data much better than the traditional discrete choice model. From the result, it can be concluded that, the parameters of price and in-vehicle time are non-random. However, the parameter of in-vehicle congestion is random, and it is affected by travelers demand of comfort when traveling and in-vehicle time. The impact of in-vehicle congestion increases as travelers demand of comfort increases, and decreases when in-vehicle time increases.
作者 刘建荣 郝小妮 LIU Jianrong;HAO Xiaoni(School of Civil Engineering and Transportation,South China University of Technology,Guangzhou 510640,Guangdong,China)
出处 《华南理工大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2019年第4期61-66,75,共7页 Journal of South China University of Technology(Natural Science Edition)
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51578247)~~
关键词 拥挤度 出行选择行为 出行舒适性 随机系数Logit模型 congestion degree travel choice behavior travel comfort random parameters Logit model
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献34

  • 1Ackerberg, D. et a1(2007), "Econometric tools for analy- zing market outcomes", in Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 6, Part A.
  • 2Anand, B. N. R. Schachar (2011), " Advertising, the matchmaker", RAND Journal of Economics 42(2).
  • 3Bae, Y.K. &. H. Benitez-Silva(2011), "Do vehicle recalls reduce the number of accidents? The case of the U. S. car market", Journal oI Policy Analysis and Management 30 (4).
  • 4Bento, A. et ai(2005), "Distributional and efficiency im- pacts of gasoline taxes", The American Economic Review 95(2).
  • 5Beresteanu, A. S. Li(2011), "Gasoline prices, govern- ment support, and the demand for hybrid vehicles in the United States", International Economic Review 52(1).
  • 6Berr)/, S, (1994), "Estimating discrete-choice models of product differentiation", The RAND Journal of Economics 25(2).
  • 7Berry, S. , J. Levinsohn A. Pakes (1995), " Automobile prices in market equilibrium", Econometrica 63(4).
  • 8Berry, S., J. Levinsohn b- A. Pakes(2004), "Differentiated products demand systems from a combination of micro and macro data: Tlae new car market", Journal of Political E- conomy 112(1).
  • 9Berry, S. J. Waldfogel(1999), "Free entry and social in- efficiency in radio broadcasting", RAND Journal of Eco- nomics 30(3).
  • 10Cameron, A.C. P. K. Trivedi(2005), Microeconomet- tics: Methods and Applications, Cambridge University.

共引文献8

同被引文献28

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部