期刊文献+

库恩科学思想的学科概念、学术体比较与现代影响

The Concept of Science,Comparison of Academic System and Modern Influence on Kuhn-Comment on The Structure of Scientific Revolution
下载PDF
导出
摘要 库恩《科学革命的结构》一书自1962年出版以来,带来了科学革命历史性的巨变,如今“革命”的内涵已经远远逾越了其最初设想的范围。研究萌芽于自然科学,成熟于交叉科学,全盛于综合科学。学界对于库恩关于“范式”与“不可通约性”概念的提法颇为关注,并逐渐被社会科学的研究大量引用,虽有质疑声与批判声,但现代科学技术与社会科学的进展受此积极影响的事实不容置疑。文章基于库恩及其《结构》的主要思想,对库恩科学思想的学科概念、学术体比较以及现代影响三方面进行解读,以期为未来理论学科与实践科学研究做规范化和知识性的积累。 Since the publication of the book The Structure of the Scientific Revolution published in 1962,it has brought about a historic change in the scientific revolution,and now the connotation of the revolution has gone far beyond its original scope.Research begins in the natural sciences,matures in interdisciplinary,and is flourishing in integrated science.For the academic"structure"in the book"paradigm"and"incommensurability"concept was quite concerned and gradually by the social science research a large number of references.Although there are doubts and criticism,the fact that there is a positive impact on the progress of modern discipline research is undeniable.Based on the main idea of Kuhn and his"Structure",the article interprets Kuhn's scientific concepts,academic comparisons,and modern influences in order to make the theoretical and practical scientific research in the future more standardized and knowledge-based.
作者 祁志伟 QI Zhi-wei(School of Public Management, Minzu University of China, Beijing 100081, China;School of Public Management, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China)
出处 《青海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2019年第3期29-35,共7页 Journal of Qinghai Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
基金 国家社会科学基金重点资助项目“民族地区基层政府社会治理能力评估及提升途径研究”(15AMZ003)
关键词 学科概念 范式争议 学术体比较 现代影响 disciplinary concepts paradigm disputes academic comparison modern influence
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献78

  • 1Th.S.库恩,敬石.合理性与理论选择[J].世界哲学,1984(3):5-9. 被引量:9
  • 2托马斯.S.库恩,纪树立.科学知识作为历史产品[J].自然辩证法通讯,1988,10(5):16-25. 被引量:32
  • 3韩林合.维特根斯坦论“语言游戏”和“生活形式”[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1996,33(1):108-115. 被引量:95
  • 4孙斌,张艳芬.从“对象”到“看”——维特根斯坦语言观的一个转变[J].现代哲学,2003(1):124-128. 被引量:2
  • 5[5]维特根斯坦.哲学研究[M].李步楼,译.上海:上海人民出版社,1996.
  • 6[1]Golinski, Ⅰ. (1998). Making natural Knowledge: Constructivism and the History of Science. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  • 7[2]Pickering, A. (1984). Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics. Edinburgh:Edinburgh University Press.
  • 8[3]Pickering, A. (1995). The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency and Science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • 9库恩 伊姆雷·拉卡托斯 艾兰·马斯格雷夫 周寄中译.对批评的答复[A].伊姆雷·拉卡托斯,艾兰·马斯格雷夫,周寄中译.批判与知识的增长[C].北京:华夏出版社,1987.311-372.
  • 10库恩.科学革命的结构[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2003.101.

共引文献131

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部