摘要
库恩《科学革命的结构》一书自1962年出版以来,带来了科学革命历史性的巨变,如今“革命”的内涵已经远远逾越了其最初设想的范围。研究萌芽于自然科学,成熟于交叉科学,全盛于综合科学。学界对于库恩关于“范式”与“不可通约性”概念的提法颇为关注,并逐渐被社会科学的研究大量引用,虽有质疑声与批判声,但现代科学技术与社会科学的进展受此积极影响的事实不容置疑。文章基于库恩及其《结构》的主要思想,对库恩科学思想的学科概念、学术体比较以及现代影响三方面进行解读,以期为未来理论学科与实践科学研究做规范化和知识性的积累。
Since the publication of the book The Structure of the Scientific Revolution published in 1962,it has brought about a historic change in the scientific revolution,and now the connotation of the revolution has gone far beyond its original scope.Research begins in the natural sciences,matures in interdisciplinary,and is flourishing in integrated science.For the academic"structure"in the book"paradigm"and"incommensurability"concept was quite concerned and gradually by the social science research a large number of references.Although there are doubts and criticism,the fact that there is a positive impact on the progress of modern discipline research is undeniable.Based on the main idea of Kuhn and his"Structure",the article interprets Kuhn's scientific concepts,academic comparisons,and modern influences in order to make the theoretical and practical scientific research in the future more standardized and knowledge-based.
作者
祁志伟
QI Zhi-wei(School of Public Management, Minzu University of China, Beijing 100081, China;School of Public Management, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China)
出处
《青海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
2019年第3期29-35,共7页
Journal of Qinghai Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
基金
国家社会科学基金重点资助项目“民族地区基层政府社会治理能力评估及提升途径研究”(15AMZ003)
关键词
学科概念
范式争议
学术体比较
现代影响
disciplinary concepts
paradigm disputes
academic comparison
modern influence