期刊文献+

标准外伤大骨瓣开颅术治疗重型颅脑损伤的临床疗效 被引量:5

Clinical Efficacy of Standard Large Traumatic Bone Flap in the Treatment of Severe Craniocerebral Injury
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究对重型脑损伤患者实施标准外伤大骨瓣与常规骨瓣开颅术治疗的效果。方法选取2014年6月-2018年10月我科收治的90例重型脑损伤患者,随机分为对照组及试验组,各45例。对照组采用常规骨瓣开颅术治疗,试验组采用标准外伤大骨瓣开颅术治疗,对比两组患者治疗后临床效果、颅内压改善情况。结果试验组治疗后恢复良好率31.11%高于对照组(P<0.05),两组术前颅内压比较无显著差异(P> 0.05),试验组术后第1天、第3天及第5天颅内压低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论对重型脑损伤患者实施标准外伤大骨瓣开颅术治疗效果显著,能够迅速降低患者颅内压。 Objective To study the effect of standard large trauma craniotomy and conventional craniotomy for patients with severe brain injury. Methods Ninety patients with severe brain injury admitted to our department from June 2014 to October 2018 were randomly divided into control group and experimental group, 45 cases in each group. The control group was treated with conventional craniotomy, while experimental group was treated with standard large traumatic craniotomy. The clinical effect and intracranial pressure improvement were compared. Results Recovery rate of experimental group 31.11% was higher than control group(P < 0.05).There was no significant difference in preoperative intracranial pressure between the two groups(P > 0.05). The intracranial pressure of experimental group was lower than control group on the 1 st, 3 rd and 5 th day after operation(P < 0.05). Conclusion Standard large traumatic craniotomy is effective for severe brain injury patients and can rapidly reduce intracranial pressure.
作者 何挺 HE Ting(Department of Neurosurgery, Laibin People's Hospital, Laibin Guangxi 546100, China)
出处 《中国卫生标准管理》 2019年第11期46-47,共2页 China Health Standard Management
关键词 重型 脑损伤 标准外伤大骨瓣 常规骨瓣 颅内压 并发症 severe brain injury standard large traumatic bone flap conventional bone flap intracranial pressure complications
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献84

  • 1秉毅,富红霞,王强,张春阳.大骨瓣减压术对老年重型颅脑损伤患者疗效及脑代谢能力的影响[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(4):1105-1106. 被引量:17
  • 2Bhat AR, Kirmani AR, Wani MA. Decompressive craniectomy with multi-dural stabs-A combined (SKIMS) technique to evacuate acute subdural hematoma with underlying severe traumatic brain edema[J]. Asian J Neurosurg, 2013, 8(1): 15-20.
  • 3Bhargava D, Alalade A, Ellamushi H, et al. Mitigating effects of external ventricular drain usage in the management of severe head injury[J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2013, 155(11): 2129-2132.
  • 4Grande PO. The Lund concept for the treatment of patients with severe traumatic brain injury[J]. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol, 2011, 23(4): 358-362.
  • 5Anderson BL, Bogason E, Brandmeir N, et al. Journal club: national variability in intracranial pressure monitoring and craniotomy for children with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury [J]. Neurosurgery, 2014, 75(2): 191-193.
  • 6Clifton GL. A review of clinical trials of hypothermia treatment for severe traumatic brain injury [J]. Ther Hypothermia Temp Manag, 2011, 1(3): 143-149.
  • 7Fang Zhi-hao, Huang Ping, Zhang bin, et al. Effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on severe craniocerebral injury[J].宁夏医科大学学报, 2014, 36(4): 441-443.
  • 8Sathya C, Burd RS, Nance ML, et al. Concordance of performance metrics among US trauma centers caring for injured children [J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2015, 79(1): 138-46.
  • 9Kuo CY, Chiou HY, Lin JW, et al. Seatbelt Use and Traumatic Brain Injury in Taiwan:A 16-Year Study [J]. Iran J Public Health, 2015, 44 (4): 470-478.
  • 10Kelly ML, Banerjee A, Nowak M, et al. Decreased mortality in traumatic brain injury following regionalization across hospital systems[J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2015, 78(4): 715-720.

共引文献109

同被引文献36

引证文献5

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部