摘要
大、小戴《礼记》的篇题更契合文章的内容,文字更精炼雅洁,阐释更具有学理性。这些“同”中之“异”,也侧面反映出大、小戴在编辑、取舍古“记”文时,有着不同的编辑倾向、学理思路。
The title of the Li Ji is more in line with the content of the article, the writing is more refined and elegant, and the interpretation is more rational. These differences in the similarities between Li Ji and Da Dai Li Ji also reflect that Da Dai and Xiao Dai have different editorial tendencies and academic ideas when editing and choosing ancient records.
作者
卢静
Lu Jing(Shanxi Normal University, Xi’an, Shanxi 710062)
出处
《职大学报》
2019年第3期36-39,31,共5页
Journal of the Staff and Worker’s University
基金
国家社会科学基金项目“《礼记》文献与礼文化的学理形成研究”(15XZW017)
