期刊文献+

在东西方哲学比较视域中探析中国哲学合法性问题

An Analysis of the Legitimacy of Chinese Philosophy from the Perspective of the Comparison of Eastern and Western Philosophies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 中国哲学关注人与自然的关系,强调天人合一的和谐,将形而上与形而下的问题相结合,将主要问题落实在人身实践上。近代以来,中国哲学在世界的地位一直备受质疑。要讲清中国哲学合法性问题,须了解东西哲学的产生并分析其自身不同发展的历史背景与趋势,比较东西方哲学的异同及其对各自民族文化带来的影响,结合中国哲学合法性问题产生与存在的时代局限与历史背景,不难发现中国哲学合法性问题是一个伪命题。中国哲学立足于历史潮头,应在坚持传统哲学以人为本的基础上,将马克思主义哲学中国化看作中西哲学融合与交流的可行性之路,坚信自身可以走向世界并逐渐占据主流。 Chinese philosophy pays attention to the relationship between man and nature,emphasizes the harmony of the unity of man and nature,combines the metaphysical and the metaphysical problems,and implements the main problems in personal practice.Since modern times,the status of Chinese philosophy in the world has been questioned.To clarify the legitimacy of Chinese philosophy,it is necessary to understand the emergence of Eastern and Western philosophy and analyze its different historical backgrounds and trends,compare the similarities and differences between Eastern and Western philosophy and their impact on their respective national cultures,and combine the historical limitations and backgrounds of the generation and existence of the legitimacy of Chinese philosophy,it is not difficult to find that the legitimacy of Chinese philosophy is a false proposition.Based on the historical trend,Chinese philosophy should regard the Sinicization of Marxist philosophy as a feasible way to integrate and exchange Chinese and Western philosophy on the basis of sticking to the people-oriented principle of traditional philosophy,and firmly believe that it can go to the world and gradually occupy the mainstream.
作者 魏三原 WEI San-yuan(School of Philosophy ,Northwest University,Xi'an 710127,Shanxi)
出处 《陇东学院学报》 2019年第3期88-91,共4页 Journal of Longdong University
关键词 中国哲学 合法性 融合 历史规律 以人为本 Chinese philosophy legitimacy integration historical rules and people oriented
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献9

  • 1牟宗三.中国哲学十九讲[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2005,18,21.
  • 2[法]德里达 张宁译.书写与差异[M].生活·读书·新知三联书店出版社,2001.p 502.
  • 3[美]麦金太尔.谁之正义?何种合理性?[M].北京:当代中国出版社,1996..
  • 4[美]华勒斯坦等.开放社会科学[M].牛津大学出版社.1997,19.
  • 5[德]黑格尔.哲学史讲演录:第一卷[M].北京:商务印书馆,1959.
  • 6[英]罗素.西方哲学史:上册[M].何兆武等译.北京:商务印书馆,1981.
  • 7胡适.中国哲学史大纲:卷上[M].姜义华主编.胡适学术文集·中国哲学史:上[M].北京:中华书局,1991.
  • 8张汝伦.邯郸学步,失其故步——也谈中国哲学研究中的“反向格义”问题[J].南京大学学报(哲学.人文科学.社会科学),2007,44(4):60-76. 被引量:37
  • 9张志伟.一种中国哲学的形而上学是否可能——关于“形而上学”译名的分析[J].中国社会科学评价,2017(2):15-22. 被引量:12

共引文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部