哲学维度及真理视角下的“艺术终结论”研究——以黑格尔、阿多诺、阿瑟·丹托的“艺术终结论”为例

Research on“the End of Art”from Philosophical Dimension and the Perspective of Truth:Taking Hegel,Adorno,Arthur C.Danto’s“the End of Art”as the Example

“艺术终结论”不单单是依据艺术自身的发展状况提出来的,而是一个关联着艺术与哲学以及艺术与真理关系的论题。要想真正弄清“艺术终结论”出现的原因及其内涵,需要从哲学维度以及真理视角对其展开研究。在具体研究中,为了更好地揭示艺术与哲学关系影响下的“艺术终结论”问题在西方历史中的嬗变,文章选取了在西方艺术发展中受哲学影响下形成的黑格尔、阿多诺、阿瑟·丹托三人的“艺术终结论”作为典型对象进行研究,从而使“艺术终结论”中关于艺术与哲学的关系的多样性特征呈现出来。

“The End of Art”is not only put forward on the basis of the development of art itself,but also a topic related to art and philosophy and the relationship between art and truth.To really understand the cause and connotation of“the End of Art”,we need to study“the End of Art”from the perspective of philosophy and truth.In the specific research,in order to better reflect the evolution of“the End of Art under the influence of the relationship between art and philosophy in the western history,the article selects Hegel,Adorno and Arthur C.Danto’s“the End of Art”as the typical research,so that the diversity of“the End of Art”can be presented in the relationship between art and philosophy.