CTTM与LBL教学法在眼科见习教学中的应用比较研究

A comparative study on the application effect of two teaching methods in ophthalmology probation

目的比较CTTM与LBL两种教学模式在眼科临床见习教学中的教学效果。方法选择2015级本科临床医学专业学生324人,以班级为单位随机分为CTTM教学组和LBL教学组进行教学。教学结束后分别以技能操作测验和病例分析测验两种方法进行见习教学效果评估,同时进行教学满意度调查,以闭卷笔试方式进行期末考试。结果理论考试成绩方面,两组学生的理论考试成绩差异无统计学意义。见习评价方面,CTTM组病例分析成绩和技能操作成绩高于LBL组。教学满意度调查评分,CTTM组学生的满意度高于LBL组。结论 CTTM教学法在调动学生学习主动性、临床理论与实践结合等方面较传统教学有明显优势。

Objective To compare the teaching effects of CTTM and LBL in ophthalmology clinical probation teaching. Methods 324 students of clinical medicine in grade 2015 were randomly divided into CTTM teaching group and LBL teaching group. After the end of teaching, the effect of probation teaching was evaluated by skill operation test and case analysis test, and the satisfaction of teaching was investigated. The final examination was conducted by closed-paper written test. Results There was no significant difference in theory test between the two groups. In probation evaluation, the case analysis and skill operation scores of CTTM group were higher than those of LBL group. The survey showed that the satisfaction of CTTM group was higher than that of LBL group. Conclusion CTTM teaching method has obvious advantages over traditional teaching in mobilizing students’ learning initiative, combining clinical theory with practice.