期刊文献+

CRISPR质粒和同源重组模板的共转染可降低CRISPR/Cas9系统的基因编辑效率 被引量:1

Co-delivery of CRISPR plasmid and HDR donor can reduce the gene editing efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9 system
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨CRISPR质粒和同源重组模板的共转染对CRISPR/Cas9系统的基因编辑效率的影响以及可行的解决办法。方法用T7E1内切酶实验和RT-qPCR检测只转染CRISPR质粒组和质粒和模板共转染组细胞内Cas9的切割效率,Cas9 RNA和DNA水平的差异;RT-qPCR检测降低共转染的模板DNA的数量时,细胞内Cas9 DNA和RNA水平的变化;RT-qPCR和T7E1内切酶实验检测先转染CRISPR质粒后转染同源重组模板时,细胞内Cas9 DNA和RNA水平以及切割效率的变化。结果与只转染CRISPR质粒组相比,CRISPR质粒和同源重组模板的共转染显著降低了CRISPR质粒的转染效率(P<0.001)和Cas9的切割效率(P<0.001)。而先转染质粒后转染同源重组模板组和只转染质粒组在CRISPR质粒的转染效率和Cas9的切割效率差别无统计学意义。结论CRISPR质粒和同源重组模板的共转染降低了CRISPR/Cas9系统的基因编辑效率,而先转染质粒后转染同源重组模板可以解决这一问题。 Objective To explore the effect of co-transfection of CRISPR plasmid and HDR donors on the gene editing efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9 system and a feasible solution to the problem.Methods T7E1 assay and RT-qPCR were used to compare the cleavage efficiency of Cas9 protein,Cas9 RNA and DNA level between cells transfected with CRSIPR plasmid only and cells co-transfected with CRISPR plasmid and HDR templates;RT-qPCR was used to detect the changes of intracellular Cas9 DNA and RNA level when reducing the quantity of co-transfected template DNA;RT-qPCR and T7E1 assay were used to measure the DNA level,RNA level and cleavage activity of Cas9 when delivering CRISPR plasmid followed by HDR donors.Results Compared with the group only CRISPR plasmid transfected,co-transfection of CRISPR plasmid and HDR donors significantly reduced the transfection efficiency of CRISPR plasmid(P<0.001)and cleavage activity of Cas9(P<0.001).But there was no significant difference in transfection efficiency of CRISPR plasmid and cutting efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9 system among only CRISPR plasmid transfected group and groups sequentially transfected with CRISPR plasmid and HDR donors.Conclusions Co-transfection of CRISPR plasmid and HDR donors can reduce the gene editing efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9 system and this problem can be solved by delivering CRISPR plasmid first and then HDR templates.
作者 林琼 张祝琴 刘德培 LIN Qiong;ZHANG Zhu-qin;LIU De-pei(State Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Biology,Institute of Basic Medical Sciences CAMS,School of Basic Medicine PUMC,Beijing 100005,China)
出处 《基础医学与临床》 CSCD 2019年第7期1048-1054,共7页 Basic and Clinical Medicine
基金 中国医学科学院医学与健康科技创新工程(2017-I2M-B&R-04) 中国医学科学院医学表观遗传中心基金(2017PT31035)
关键词 CRISPR/Cas9系统 共转染 分开转染 同源重组模板 CRISPR/Cas9 system co-transfection sequential transfection homology-directed repair template
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献147

  • 1Wang M, Wu W, Wu W, et al. PARP-1 and Ku compete for repair of DNA double strand breaks by distinct NHEJ pathways. Nucleic Acids Res 2006; 34:6170-6182.
  • 2Daley JM, Palmbos PL, Wu D, Wilson TE. Nonhomologous end joining in yeast. Annu Rev Genet 2005; 39:431-451.
  • 3Lees-Miller SP, Meek K. Repair of DNA double strand breaks by non-homologous end joining. Biochimie 2003; 85:1161-1173.
  • 4Burma S, Chen BE Chen DJ. Role of non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) in maintaining genomic integrity. DNA Repair (AmsO 2006; 5:1042-1048.
  • 5Rouse J, Jackson SP. Interfaces between the detection, signaling, and repair of DNA damage. Science 2002; 297:547-551.
  • 6Strathem JN, Shafer BK, McGill CB. DNA synthesis errors associated with double-strand break repair. Genetics 1995; 140:965-972.
  • 7NickoloffJA. Recombination: mechanisms and roles in tumorigenesis. In: Bertino JR, ed, Encyclopedia of Cancer. 2nd Edition. San Diego, USA- Elsevier Science, 2002:49-59.
  • 8Krogh BO, Symington LS. Recombination proteins in yeast. Annu Rev Genet 2004; 38:233-271.
  • 9West SC. Molecular views of recombination proteins and their control. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol2003; 4:435-445.
  • 10Champion MD, Hawley RS. Playing for half the deck: the molecular biology of meiosis. Nat Cell Biol 2002; 4(Suppl): s50-s56.

共引文献67

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部