期刊文献+

经腹彩色多普勒超声联合经阴道彩色多普勒超声对子宫瘢痕妊娠的诊断价值 被引量:29

Diagnostic value of transabdominal color Doppler ultrasound and transvaginal color Doppler ultrasound in uterine scar pregnancy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨经腹彩色多普勒超声、经阴道彩色多普勒超声对子宫瘢痕妊娠的临床诊断价值。方法选择侯马市人民医院2013年1月至2018年7月疑似子宫瘢痕妊娠患者42例作为研究对象,所有患者均接受经腹部彩超、经阴道彩超检查,记录两者单独检查和联合检查结果,并将其与病理诊断或随访确诊结果进行对照研究。结果42例疑似子宫瘢痕妊娠患者均顺利完成经腹、经阴道彩超检查,经腹、经阴道彩超检查对子宫瘢痕妊娠的诊断敏感性、特异性均较低(经腹敏感性为55.56%、特异性为50.00%,经阴道敏感性为61.11%、特异性为66.67%),而两者联合检查的敏感性、特异性较高(分别为88.89%、83.33%),差异有统计学意义,P<0.05。结论临床医生在实际诊断疑似子宫瘢痕妊娠患者时,建议联合应用经腹彩超、经阴道彩超检查,有利于提高此类疾病的正确检出率,保障患者疗效及预后。 Objective To investigate the clinical value of transabdominal color Doppler ultrasound and transvaginal color Doppler ultrasound in the diagnosis of uterine scar pregnancy.Methods Forty-two patients with suspected uterine scar pregnancy in Houma People’s Hospital from January 2013 to July 2018 were examined by transabdominal color Doppler ultrasound and transvaginal color Doppler ultrasound.The results of the two examinations and combined examination were recorded and compared with the results of pathological diagnosis or follow-up diagnosis.Results Forty-two patients with suspected uterine scar pregnancy successfully completed transabdominal and transvaginal color Doppler ultrasonography.The sensitivity and specificity of transabdominal and transvaginal color Doppler ultrasound examination for uterine scar pregnancy were low.The sensitivity of transabdominal examination was 55.56%,and the specificity was 50.00%.The sensitivity of transvaginal examination was 61.11%,and the specificity was 66.67%.The sensitivity and specificity of the combined examinations were 88.89%,83.33%,respectively,higher than the two single mothods and the differences were significant(P<0.05).Conclusions In the actual diagnosis of suspected uterine scar pregnancy patients,the combined application of transabdominal color ultrasound,transvaginal color ultrasound examination is recommended,which is conducive to improving the correct detection rate of such diseases,so as to ensure the efficacy and prognosis of patients.
作者 黄冬香 郗静怡 闫静 杨转丽 张建翔 徐匆匆 Huang Dongxiang;Yan Jingyi;Yan Jing;Yang Zhuanli;Zhang Jianxiang;Xu Congcong(Department of General Medicine,Houma People’s Hospital,Houma 043003,China)
出处 《中国实用医刊》 2019年第8期76-78,共3页 Chinese Journal of Practical Medicine
关键词 子宫瘢痕妊娠 经腹彩色多普勒超声 经阴道彩色多普勒超声 诊断价值 Uterine scar pregnancy Transabdominal color Doppler ultrasound Transvaginal color Doppler ultrasound Diagnostic value
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献31

  • 1谭毅,谢平,陈雪梅.疤痕子宫再次妊娠分娩方式选择[J].中国妇幼健康研究,2007,18(2):123-124. 被引量:17
  • 2谢红宁.妇产科超声诊断学.北京:人民卫生出版社.2004.279-280.
  • 3Flystra DL, Pound-Chang T, Miller MC, et al. Ectopic pregnancy within a cesarean delivery scar; a review. Obstet Cyneeol Surv, 2002,57(8) :537-543.
  • 4Ash A, Smith A, Maxwell D. Caesarean scar pregnancy. BJOC, 2007,114(3) :253-263.
  • 5Seow K M, Hang LW,Lin Y H,et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy: is- sues in management. Ultrasound Obstet Cynecol, 2004,23 ( 3 ) : 247-253.
  • 6Rotas MA, Haberman S, l.evgur M. Cesarean scar ectopic preg- nancies etiology, diagnosis and management. Obstet Cynecol, 2006,107(6) : 1373-1377.
  • 7Leung GM, Lam TH, Wang I, et al. Caesarean section rate in England and Wales. Caesarean section rates in Hang Kang[ J]. BMJ, 2002,324 (7335) :486.
  • 8Locatelli A, Ghidini A, Ciriello E, et al. Induction of labor: compari- son of a cohort with uterine sear from previouseesarean section vs. a co- hort with intact uterus [J].J Materu Fetal Neonatal Med, 2006,19 (8) : 471 - 475.
  • 9Sen S, Malik S, Salhan S. Ultrasonographic evaluation of lower uterine segment thickness in patients ofprevious cesarean section [ J ]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2004,87 ( 3 ) :215 - 219.
  • 10吴钟瑜.实用妇产科超声诊断学.3版.天津:天津科技翻译出版公司,2007:128.

共引文献259

同被引文献176

引证文献29

二级引证文献62

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部