期刊文献+

不同途径注射比伐芦定对急性冠脉综合征患者行介入治疗的疗效及安全性评价 被引量:11

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨经冠脉和经外周静脉注射比伐芦定对急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后即刻疗效和随访期间发生主要心脏不良事件(MACE)的影响。方法入选本院150例诊断为急性冠脉综合征的住院患者,均行介入治疗。采用随机数字表法分为A、B、C三组,每组50例(A组:经外周静脉+冠脉内注射比伐芦定组;B组:经外周静脉注射比伐芦定组;C组:常规肝素治疗组)。随访3个月,比较三组患者PCI术中活化凝血时间(ACT)达标率及发生无复流/慢血流的情况,住院期间及随访3个月发生心绞痛、再发心肌梗死、心力衰竭、靶血管再次血运重建率、心源性死亡等MACE的情况以及出血事件的发生率。结果 A、B组PCI术中ACT达标率均高于C组(P<0.05)。介入治疗术中A组校正的TIMI血流帧数计数(CTFC)及TIMI心肌灌注分级(TMP)优于B组和C组(P < 0. 05 ), B组与C组比较差异无统计学意义(P >0.05)。随访3个月,A组总MACE发生率明显少于B组和C组(P<0.05),而B组、C组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。A组、B组出血事件均明显少于C组,A组与B组之间差异无统计学意义(P >0. 05),三组均无死亡事件发生。结论对于ACS患者行PCI时,经冠脉内注射和经外周静脉注射比伐芦定,术中均能获得更高的ACT达标率。经冠脉内注射可获得更好的心肌微循环再灌注,可显著减少3个月心脏不良事件的发生,且不增加出血事件。
出处 《中国医师杂志》 CAS 2019年第6期923-925,共3页 Journal of Chinese Physician
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献25

  • 1丛洪良,杜纪兵,齐学艳,张梅,王伟,陈树涛,周长钰,李广平,黄体钢.急性心肌梗死患者经皮冠脉介入术后无/慢复流发生与炎症[J].中华高血压杂志,2007,15(6):485-488. 被引量:16
  • 2Aggarwal A, Sobel BE, Schneider DJ, et al. Decreased platelet reactivity in blood anticoagulated with bivalirudin or enoxaparin compared with unfractionated heparin: implications for coronary intervention. J Thromb Thrombolysis, 2002,13 ( 3 ) : 161-165.
  • 3Anand SX, Kim MC, Kamran M, et al. Comparison of platelet function and morphology in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention receiving bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin versus clopidogrel pretreatment and bivalirudin. Am J Cardiol, 2007,100 (3) : 417-424.
  • 4Vance GN, Brad L,William QG,et al. Argatroban, Bivalirudin, and Lepirudin do not Decrease Clot Propagation and Strength as Effectively as Heparin-activated Antithrombin In Vitro. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantatian, 2006,189 (6) :653-662.
  • 5Friederike K, Harold LD, Deborah AW, et al. Increased expression of platelet P-selectin and formation of platelet--leukocyte aggregates in blood from patients treated with unfractionated heparin plus eptifibatide compared with bivalirudin. Thrombosis Research, 2006,118 ( 7 ) , 361-369.
  • 6Eli IL, Rajnikant P, Azim K, et al. Anti-thrombotic effect of bivalirudin compared with eptifibatide and unfractionated heparin in diabetic patients. Thromb Haemost,2006,95(7) : 441-446.
  • 7David JS, Friederike K, Burton ES, et al. Greater inhibitory effects of bivalinldin compared with unfractionated heparin plus eptifibitide on thrombin-induced platelet activation. Coronary Artery Disease, 2006, 121 (7) :471-476.
  • 8Andrew J, Leger BA, Suzanne L, et al Blocking the Protease-Activated Receptor 1-4 Heterodimer in Platelet-Mediated Thrombosis. Circulation ,2006,113 ( 1 ) : 1244-1254.
  • 9John AB, John ST, Jeffrey BR. Treatment with Bivalirudin ( HIRU- LOG) as Compared with Heparin during Cornary Angioplasty for Unstable or Postinfarction Angina. N Engl J Med, 1995,333 (3):764- 769.
  • 10Mehran R,Lansky A J,Witzenbichler B,et al.Bivalirudin in patients undergoing primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction (HORIZONS-AMI):1-year results of a randomised controlled trial.Lancet,2009,374(9696):1149-1159.

共引文献816

同被引文献113

引证文献11

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部