深圳市场化城市更新中的行政征收问题研究

Some Considerations concerning Administrative Expropriation in Shenzhen’s Urban Development

深圳的市场化城市更新制度赋予了相关权益人对更新目标和利益分配的自主谈判权利,彰显了对私权的尊重和保护,但市场化方式易形成谈判僵局,有损各方利益。有观点认为政府应当行使征收权力打破僵局,实现更新中的公共利益,然而,更新中虽有公共利益,但其目的、实施主体和改造对象使其区别于国家法定之“旧城改造”,根据现行法律规定,将其纳入公共利益作为动用行政权力征收的理由尚未充分。解决此问题需一方面调试现有征收制度,另一方面探索司法途径。

The market-oriented urban regeneration in Shenzhen, which has given large bargaining power to the real estate owners, is facing the trouble of negotiation deadlock. The “100% agreement” regulation requires developers to reach agreement with all the real estate owners. It is hoped the government can break the deadlock with administrative expropriation, but the legal basis to do so is in doubt.