期刊文献+

基于兴趣点密度加权的图像美学质量评价

An image aesthetic quality evaluation based on density of interest points weighting
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对现有方法没有充分考虑图像空间美学信息,并且评价效果过分依赖于主体区域识别效果的问题,提出一种基于兴趣点密度加权的图像美学质量评价模型。首先对图像进行超像素分割和兴趣点检测并提取特征描述子,然后统计超像素块内的兴趣点个数,根据兴趣点密度对超像素块内的特征描述子进行加权并进行局部约束线性编码处理,最后利用机器学习方法进行图像美学质量评价。实验结果表明该方法用来图像美学质量评价大大减少了特征维度和计算时间,提高了评价模型的准确率。 The aesthetic evaluation model has low accuracy since the existing methods heavily rely on the performance of object region extraction and insufficient characterization of image space aesthetic information.Aiming at solving the problem,an image aesthetic quality evaluation model based on density of interest points weighting is proposed.First,su.perpixel segmentation was used to segment images into irregular superpixel blocks,and interest points were detected and feature descriptors were extracted on the original image;Second,the density of interest points in the superpixel block were calculated,and the feature descriptors were weighted according to the density of interest points and coded by localityconstrained linear coding method.Finally,the machine learning method was used to evaluate the aesthetic quality of im.ages.The experimental results show that this proposed method is effective for image aesthetic quality evaluation,which greatly reduces the feature dimension and the computation time,and improves the accuracy of the evaluation model.
作者 于明 彭伟峰 郭迎春 YU Ming;PENG Weifeng;GUO Yingchun(School of Artifical Intelligence,Hebei University of Technology,Tianjin 300401,China)
出处 《河北工业大学学报》 CAS 2019年第3期1-6,共6页 Journal of Hebei University of Technology
基金 天津市科技计划项目(15ZCZDNC00130) 河北省自然科学基金(F2015202239)
关键词 图像美学 质量评价 超像素分割 兴趣点密度加权 image aesthetic quality evaluation superpixel segmentation density of interest points weighting
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献40

  • 1郭云彪,尤新刚,张春田,周琳娜.面向信息隐藏的图像复杂度研究[J].电子学报,2006,34(6):1048-1052. 被引量:17
  • 2美国纽约摄影学院.美国纽约摄影学院摄影教材[M].李之聪,等译.北京:中国摄影出版社,2008.
  • 3Hoening F. Defining computational aesthetics [ C ]//Proceedings of Eurographics Workshop on Computational Aesthetics in Graphics, Visualization and Imaging. Switzerland: Eurographics Association, 2005 : 13-18.
  • 4Datta R, Joshi D, Li J,et al. Studying aesthetics in photographic images using a computational approach [ C ]//Proceedings of European Conference on Computer Vision. Heidelberg: Springer Berlin, 2006: 288-301.
  • 5Datta R, Wang J Z. ACQUINE: Aesthetic quality inference engine real-time automatic rating of photo aesthetics [ C ]//Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia Information Retrieval. New York : Association for Computing Machinery, 2010: 421-424.
  • 6Wu Y, Bauckhage C, Thurau C. The good, the bad, and the ugly: predicting aesthetic image labels [ C]//Proceedings of 2010 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition( ICPR 2010). Piscataway: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engi- neers Inc, 2010 : 1586-1589.
  • 7Wong L K, Low K L. Saliency-enhanced image aesthetics class prediction [ C ]//Proceedings of 2009 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing( ICIP 2009). Piscataway: IEEE Computer Society, 2009:997-1000.
  • 8Luo Y, Tang X. Photo and video quality evaluation: focusing on the subject [ C ]//Proceedings of 2008 lOth European Conference on Computer Vision ( ECCV 2008 ). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2008,5304:386-399.
  • 9Li C, Tsuhan C. Aesthetic visual quality assessment of paintings [ J ]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 2009, 3(2) :236-252.
  • 10Obrador P, Anguera X, Oliveira R. The role of tags and image aesthetics in social image search [ C ]//Proceedings of 17th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, Workshop on Social Media(ACM MM). New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2009:65-72.

共引文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部