期刊文献+

直接测压法测量腹内压正常值范围及腹水与腹内压波动关系的研究 被引量:4

Explore the normal range of intra-abdominal pressure with direct measurement and the relationship between ascites quantitation and intra-abdominal pressure
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的通过直接测压法寻找腹内压的正常范围,并探讨腹水量与腹内压的关系。方法采用前瞻性研究的方法,通过直接测压法测量腹内压,获得无腹水患者腹内压正常值范围。同时测定腹水组患者腹内压值,与无腹水组进行比较。取无腹水患者,在腹腔注入不同体积含化疗药物的生理盐水,动态监测腹水增加后腹内压的变化,并建立两者关系式。结果①67例无腹水患者直接测压法测得腹内压的95%的可信区间(95%CI)为4.99~6.11 mm Hg(1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa);②无腹水组的腹内压明显低于腹水组(t=-2.188,P=0.031);③无腹水患者腹内灌注生理盐水体积与腹内压变化之间具有显著的相关性(R=0.113,t=5.206,P<0.01)。设定灌注药体积为自变量(X),腹内压为因变量(Y),一元回归方程式为:Y=7.651X+1.491(P<0.01);④腹腔灌注生理盐水后获得腹内压测量值范围4~19 mm Hg。其中<12 mm Hg 48人次,12~15 mm Hg 52人次,16~20 mm Hg 5人次,21~25 mm Hg 0人次,>25 mm Hg 0人次,所有患者均未出现ACS。结论直接测压法腹内压的正常值范围是4.99~6.11 mm Hg,与Kron测量法正常值范围在数值上不同,需进一步研究确定两者之间的关系。腹水增多与腹内压的升高,存在正向线性关系,因此腹水增多时需警惕腹腔内高压(IAH)及腹腔间隔室综合征(ACS)的发生;腹水增多引起ACS可能与高压状态持续时间相关,早期缓解腹内高压,对预防和治疗ACS具有重要意义。 Objective To explore the normal range of intra-abdominal pressure(IAP) using direct measurement, and discuss the relationship between ascites quantitation and intra-abdominal pressure. Methods A prospective cohort study was conducted. We acquire the normal range of IAP in patients without ascites using direct measurement. Meanwhile, we compared the IAP of ascites group with non-ascites group. Then, we injected different volume of normal saline containing chemotherapeutics drugs into the abdominal cavity of non-ascites, monitor the change of IAP, and found the relationship between them.Results ① The 95% confidence interval of the IAP measuring by direct measurement in non-ascites was 4.99-6.11 mm Hg(1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa).②The IAP of non-ascites was significant lower than ascites group(t=-2.188, P=0.031).③A significant linear correlation was observed between the volume of normal saline and IAP(R=0.113, t=5.206, P<0.01), the regression equation was Y=7.651 X+1.491(P<0.01).④The range of IAP after injecting normal saline was 4-19 mm Hg. Among them, there were 52 between 12 and 15 mm Hg and 5 between 16 and 20 mm Hg. There were no patients between 21 and 25 mm Hg and >25 mm Hg. All the patients had no organ dysfunction or organ failure. Conclusion The normal range of IAP measuring by direct measurement is 4.99-6.11 mm Hg, which different from Kron technique in numerical, more studies are needed to explore the relation between them. An increase in ascites can lead the increase in IAP, and there is a linear correlation between them, so we should worry about intra abdominal hypertension(IAH) or abdominal compartment syndrome(ACS) when increase in ascites. The happen of ACS has relationship with the duration of high pressure caused by ascites, so reduce IAP timely has important significance in precention an treatment ACS.
作者 徐芳媛 朱元贞 汪虹 方平 吴怡青 吴鹏飞 张牧城 王根和 XU Fang-yuan;ZHU Yuan-zhen;WANG Hong(Department of Critical Care Medicine, Huangshan Peoples Hospital Affiliated to Wannan Medical College, Huangshan, Anhui 245400, China)
出处 《中华全科医学》 2019年第8期1317-1319,1343,共4页 Chinese Journal of General Practice
基金 安徽省公益研究联动计划项目(15011d04069)
关键词 腹腔内压力 腹腔内高压 腹腔间隔室综合征 直接测压法 Intra abdominal pressure Intra abdominal hypertension Abdominal compartment syndrome Direct measurement
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献20

  • 1Horster S, Stemmler HJ, Sparrer J, et al. Mechanical ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure in critically ill patients: comparison of CW-Doppler ultrasound cardiac output monitoring (USCOM) and thermodilution (PiCCO) [ J ]. Acta Cardiol, 2012, 67 (2): 177-185.
  • 2Lambert P, Sloth E, Smith B, et al. Does a positive end-expiratory pressure-induced reduction in stroke volume indicate preload responsiveness? An experimental study [ J ]. Aeta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2007, 51 (4) : 415-25.
  • 3Quintel M, Pelosi P, Caironi P, et al. An increase of abdominal pressure increases pulmonary edema in oleie acid-induced lung injury [J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2004, 169 (4) : 534- 541.
  • 4Bernard GR, Artigas A, Brigham KL, et al. The American- European Consensus Conference on ARDS. Definitions, mechanisms, relevant outcomes, and clinical trial coordination [J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 1994, 149 (3Ptl) : 818-824.
  • 5Cheatham ML, Malbrain ML, Kirkpatriek A, et al. Results from the International Conference of Experts on Intra-abdominal Hypertension and Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. II. Recommendations [ J]. Intensive Care Med, 2007, 33 (6): 951-962.
  • 6Quintel M, Pelosi P, Caironi P. An increase of abdominal pressure increases pulmonary edema in oleic acid-induced lung injury [ J ]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2004, 169 (4) : 534-541.
  • 7Runck H, Schumann S, Tacke S, et al. Effects of intra-abdominal pressure on respiratory system mechanics in mechanically ventilated rats [J]. Respir Physiol Neurobiol, 2012, 180 (2/3): 204- 210.
  • 8Maybauer DM, Talke PO, Westphal M, et al. Positive end- expiratory pressure ventilation increases extravascular lung water due to a decrease in lung lymph flow [ J ]. Anaesth Intensive Care, 2006, 34 (3): 329-333.
  • 9Lattuada M, Hedenstierna G. Abdominal lymph flow in an endotoxin sepsis model: influence of spontaneous breathing and mechanical ventilation [ J ]. Crit Care Med, 2006, 34 ( 11 ) : 2792-2798.
  • 10Hau J, Van Hoosier GL Jr. Handbook of laboratory animal science: vol. IlL Animal models, 2nd ed [ M. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2002: 289-300.

共引文献58

同被引文献35

引证文献4

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部