期刊文献+

科研创新团队成员适宜度评价研究 被引量:3

Research on suitability evaluation of team members of scientific research and innovation team
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的构建科研创新团队成员适宜度评价的定量评价模型。方法明确科研团队成员评价的关键指标,包括:成员专业相关性评价、成员学术贡献预期评价、合作便利性评价指标、目标的共同性评价指标分析等,对相关指标进行定性分析,确定不同指标各个子项目的权重等级。最后根据指标重要性、等级等,赋予权重和分值,进而设计出计算的数学模型。结果经过模拟演算,设计的公式可以较好的体现不同指标的权重等级,使得科研团队成员适宜度评价得以实现。结论对创新团队成员的适宜度评价指标进行定量评价,使得对创新团队成员的评审有据可循,评价结果公平公正,易于各方接受,也有助于引导团队明确组建方向。 Objective To construct a quantitative evaluation model for the suitability evaluation of scientific research innovation team members. Methods Firstly to identify and clarify the key indicators of the evaluation of scientific research team members, including: the evaluation of professional relevance of members, academic contribution expectation of members, evaluation indicators of cooperation convenience, and analysis of common evaluation indicators of objectives. Secondly, to conduct qualitative analysis of relevant indicators to determine the weighting levels of each sub-item of different indicators. Finally, design the mathematical model of calculation according to the weights and scores granted to the importance, grade, etc. of the indicators. Results After the simulation calculation, the designed formula can better reflect the weighting level of different indicators, which makes the evaluation of the suitability of the research team members feasible. Conclusions Quantitative evaluation of the suitability evaluation index of innovation team members makes the evaluation of innovation team members have evidence to follow, the evaluation results are fair and equitable, and easy to be accepted by all parties. It also helps to guide the team to clearly establish the direction.
作者 阮鹏 刘卫华 彭云 Ruan Peng;Liu Weihua;Peng Yun(First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College ,Chengdu 601500,China)
出处 《中华医学科研管理杂志》 2019年第3期210-213,共4页 Chinese Journal of Medical Science Research Management
基金 四川省科技厅软科学项目(2013ZR0082).
关键词 科研管理 创新团队 科技评价 定量评价 Scientific research management Innovation team Science and technology evaluation Quantitative evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献130

共引文献130

同被引文献28

引证文献3

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部