期刊文献+

The effect of pore size and porosity of Ti6Al4V scaffolds on MC3T3-E1 cells and tissue in rabbits 被引量:2

The effect of pore size and porosity of Ti6Al4V scaffolds on MC3T3-E1 cells and tissue in rabbits
原文传递
导出
摘要 Electron beam melting(EBM) allows the fabrication of specific porous titanium implants, whereas their in vitro and in vivo biological performance should be further investigated. In this study, we examined the porous Ti6 Al4 V scaffolds(low, 334.1 μm pore size with 55.4% porosity;middle, 383.2 μm pore size with 65.2% porosity;and high, 401.6 μm pore size with 78.1%porosity) fabricated through EBM. The structural characterization and mechanical properties of porous Ti6 Al4 V scaffolds were measured through micro-computed tomography(micro-CT), scanning electron microscopy, and a material testing system.MC3 T3-E1 cells were used to assess the proliferation and differentiation of the cells on different scaffolds at day 7 and day 14 based on the expression levels of genes, including alkaline phosphatase, bone morphogenetic protein-2, osteopontin and runtrelated transcription factor-2. Rabbits with distal femoral defects were utilized to evaluate bone ingrowth in the porous titanium.All of the samples were subjected to micro-CT and histological analysis after 12 weeks. Results showed that compressive Young’s modulus of 0.3–1.1 GPa was similar to the trabecular bone. The three types of porous Ti6 Al4 V scaffolds were inclined to promote cell proliferation, whereas cell differentiation and bone ingrowth into the porous scaffolds were biased to the porous titanium with relatively large pores and porosity(middle and high). This study implied that the present porous implant design,which had the combined advantages of different pore sizes and porosity, might be meaningful and promising for trabecular bone defect restoration. Electron beam melting(EBM) allows the fabrication of specific porous titanium implants, whereas their in vitro and in vivo biological performance should be further investigated. In this study, we examined the porous Ti6 Al4 V scaffolds(low, 334.1 μm pore size with 55.4% porosity; middle, 383.2 μm pore size with 65.2% porosity; and high, 401.6 μm pore size with 78.1%porosity) fabricated through EBM. The structural characterization and mechanical properties of porous Ti6 Al4 V scaffolds were measured through micro-computed tomography(micro-CT), scanning electron microscopy, and a material testing system.MC3 T3-E1 cells were used to assess the proliferation and differentiation of the cells on different scaffolds at day 7 and day 14 based on the expression levels of genes, including alkaline phosphatase, bone morphogenetic protein-2, osteopontin and runtrelated transcription factor-2. Rabbits with distal femoral defects were utilized to evaluate bone ingrowth in the porous titanium.All of the samples were subjected to micro-CT and histological analysis after 12 weeks. Results showed that compressive Young’s modulus of 0.3–1.1 GPa was similar to the trabecular bone. The three types of porous Ti6 Al4 V scaffolds were inclined to promote cell proliferation, whereas cell differentiation and bone ingrowth into the porous scaffolds were biased to the porous titanium with relatively large pores and porosity(middle and high). This study implied that the present porous implant design,which had the combined advantages of different pore sizes and porosity, might be meaningful and promising for trabecular bone defect restoration.
出处 《Science China(Technological Sciences)》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2019年第7期1160-1168,共9页 中国科学(技术科学英文版)
基金 supported by the China National Key Research and Development Plan Project (Grant No. 2016YFB1101102) Fundamental Research Funds for Central Public Welfare Research Institutes (Grant No. 118009001000160001)
关键词 PORE size POROSITY porous titanium alloy scaffolds OSTEOGENESIS bone DEFECT pore size porosity porous titanium alloy scaffolds osteogenesis bone defect
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献26

  • 1Crawford RP,Cann CE,Keaveny TM.Finite element models predict in vitro vertebral body compressive strength better than quantitative computed tomography[J].Bone,2003,33(4):744-750.
  • 2Carter DR,Hayes WC.The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,1977,59(7):954-962.
  • 3Morgan EF,Bayraktar HH,Keaveny TM.Trabecular bone modulus-density relationships depend on anatomic site[J].J Biomech,2003,36(7):897-904.
  • 4Morgan EF,Keaveny TM.Dependence of yield strain of human trabecular bone on anatomic site[J].J Biomech,2001,34(5):569-577.
  • 5Kopperdahl DL,Keaveny TM.Yield strain behavior of trabecular bone[J].J Biomech,1998,31(7):601-608.
  • 6Helgason B,Perilli E,Schileo E,et al.Mathematical relationships between bone density and mechanical properties:A literature review[J].Clin Biomech,2008,23(2):135-146.
  • 7Keller TS.Predicting the compressive mechanical behavior of bone[J].J Biomech,1994,27(9):1159-1168.
  • 8Grampp S,Genant HK,Mathur A,et al.Comparisons of noninvasive bone mineral measurements in assessing agerelated loss,fracture discrimination,and diagnostic classification[J].J Bone Miner Res,1997,12(5):697-711.
  • 9Hobatho MC,Rho JY,Ashman RB.Anatomical variation of human cancellous bone mechanical properties in vitro[J].Stud Health Technol Inform,1997:157-174.
  • 10Rho J,Hobatho M,Ashman R.Relations of mechanical properties to density and CT numbers in human bone[J].Med Eng Phys,1995,17(5):347-355.

共引文献30

同被引文献24

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部