期刊文献+

学生学科素养培育路径研究——基于科学论证活动的话语分析 被引量:1

A Research into Cultivation Students’ Disciplinary Competences——Based on the Discourse Analysis of Scientific Argumentation Activities
下载PDF
导出
摘要 学科素养的养成需要有效的课堂对话,研究运用话语分析的方法探究CER科学论证教学对发展学生科学素养的影响。从运用科学语言、识别并考量对立观点、使用证据三个维度分阶段提供对话支架。结果表明,随着干预进行,师生的话语频率比一直维持在较稳定的水平,学生的话语形式逐渐从累积性话语过渡至探究式话语,对科学现象的解释从经验式判断转向基于证据的理性推理,并在此基础上提出了教学优化建议。 The formation of disciplinary competences requires productive dialogues in class. This research employed discourse analysis to to explore the influence of CER, a form of scientific demonstration teaching, on the development of students’ scientific literacy. The dialogic scaffolding has been supplied by stages from three dimensions, including utilizing scientific language, identifying and considering the opposing views, and applying evidence. The result shows that the ratio of teacher’s and student’s discourse frequency was relatively stable. However, the form of students’ discourse changed from cumulative talk to exploratory talk, and from experience-based judgement to evidence-based reasoning. Based on that, this research has proposed some suggestions for the optimization of teaching.
作者 宋歌 SONG Ge(Department of Education, Henan Normal University, XinxiangHenan, 453007;Department of Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai,200062)
出处 《现代基础教育研究》 2019年第2期160-167,共8页 Research on Modern Basic Education
关键词 科学素养 论辩素养 科学论证 话语分析 scientific literacy argumentative competence scientific argumentation discourse analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献32

  • 1万东升,张红霞.我国非正式科学教育发展的困境与路径选择——基于美国的经验[J].教育科学,2013,29(4):6-11. 被引量:6
  • 2张红霞,郁波.小学科学教师科学素养调查研究[J].教育研究,2004,25(11):68-73. 被引量:62
  • 3马宏佳,周志华.中外科学教育教学策略比较[J].课程.教材.教法,2005,25(1):91-96. 被引量:14
  • 4National Research Council.A Framework for K-12 Seience Education:Practices,Crosscutting Concepts,and Core Ideas [M].Washington,DC:The National Academies Press,2012.30,42-44 ,44,45.
  • 5National Research Council.National Science Education Standards[S].Washington,D.C.:The National Academies Press,1996. 23,105.
  • 6C.R.Mann.The Interpretation of the College Entrance Examination Board's New Definition of the Requirement in Physies [J].Educational Review,1909(7).
  • 7John Dewey,Science as Subject-Matter and as Method[J].Science,1910, (1).
  • 8John Dewey.How We Think[M].Lexington,MA:Heath,1910.72.
  • 9Committee on the Objectives of a General Education in a Free Society .General Education in a Free Society:Report of the Harvard Committee[M].Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1945.158.
  • 10John Dewey. How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process[M].Boston,MA:D.C.Heath and Company,1933.115-116.

共引文献418

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部