摘要
人文社会科学新创学术期刊评价面临评价对象范围难以确定、期刊学科分类困难、传统期刊评价方法需要改进等多方面的挑战。在新刊评价的实践探索中,采用了以下的路径:有针对性地明确全面综合质量评价的期刊评价目的;从时间和内容两个维度界定评价对象范围;制定针对新刊的学科分类体系;根据新刊特点选择适用指标并设计出中国人文社会科学期刊AMI综合评价指标体系。当然,新刊评价尚处于探索阶段,数据采集过程、评价指标改进、学科分类体系和期刊归类方法等都还可以继续改进。
The evaluation of new academic journals in the humanities and social sciences faces many challenges such as the difficulty in determining the scope of evaluation object,the difficulty of the disciplinary classification of journals,and the need for improvement in traditional journal evaluation methods.In the practical exploration of the evaluation of new journals,the following approaches are adopted:targeting and clarifying the purpose of the comprehensive quality evaluation of journals;defining the scope of the evaluation object from the two dimensions of time and content;developing a disciplinary classification system for new journals;choosing applicable indicators according to new journals’characteristics;and designing an AMI comprehensive evaluation index system for Chinese humanities and social science journals.Of course,the evaluation of new journals is still in the exploratory stage,and the data collection process,improvement of the evaluation index,disciplinary classification system,and journal classification method still have room for improvement.
出处
《中国社会科学评价》
2019年第2期131-140,144,共11页
China Social Science Review
