期刊文献+

T-RFLP和454焦磷酸测序方法分析制麦过程细菌群落的动态变化 被引量:4

Bacterial Community Dynamics during Malting Based on T-RFLP and 454 Pyrosequencing Profiles
下载PDF
导出
摘要 确定微生物菌群特性是制麦管理与优化的关键一步。本研究以两个不同收获年份及两个同批次不同制麦方式的大麦为样品,采用两种非培养计数方法,即16S核糖体RNA(16S rRNA)末端限制片段长度多态性(T-RFLP)和454焦磷酸测序,检测制麦过程细菌及乳酸菌菌群结构,以期全面、准确分析细菌群落结构及动态变化。研究结果显示:不同收获年份的大麦细菌菌群结构存在差异,整个细菌群落结构随着制麦过程而发生变化,而不同发芽方式之间并没有明显的区别。454焦磷酸测序结果显示乳酸菌有139个运算分类单元(OTU),所有样品有88%的序列覆盖了5个OTU(如Weissella、Lactobacillus和Leuconostoc菌属),说明制麦过程乳酸菌的多样性较低,优势乳酸菌相对数量随着制麦条件变化而波动,并且大麦的收获年份和制麦环境也影响乳酸菌的菌群结构。 Characterization of the microflora during malting is an essential step towards process management and optimization. The aim of this study was to characterize the bacterial communities using two culture-independent methods,including Terminal Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism(T-RFLP) and 454 pyrosequencing,targeting the 16S rRNA gene. In order to analyze bacterial communities and dynamics fully and precisely,the same batch of barley originated from two harvest years using two malting methods was studied in entire bacterial community and lactic acid bacteria(LAB). The results showed that the bacterial community structure of barley from different years was different and changed during the malting process,but there was no significance difference between the two malting methods. Zooming in the LAB community using 454 pyrosequencing revealed a total of 139 operational taxonomic units(OTUs). LAB diversity appeared relatively limited since 88% of the sequences were covered by the same five OTUs(representing members of Weissella,Lactobacillus and Leuconostoc) present in all samples investigated. Fluctuations in the relative abundances of the dominant LAB were observed with the process conditions. In addition,both the year of harvest and malting environment influenced the LAB community structure.
作者 邱然 陆健 QIU Ran;LU Jia(School of Biotechnology ,Jiangnan University ,Wuxi 214122 ,China;Key Laboratory of Industrial Biotechnology ,Ministry of Education ,Jiangnan University ,Wuxi 214122 ,China;National Engineering Laboratory for Cereal Fermentation Technology ,Jiangnan University ,Wuxi 214122 ,China)
出处 《食品与生物技术学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2019年第4期71-77,共7页 Journal of Food Science and Biotechnology
基金 国家973计划项目(2013CB733602) 国家863计划项目(2013AA102109) 江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(NCET-20180121-3)
关键词 麦芽 微生物菌群 乳酸菌 末端限制片段长度多态性 malt microbial community LAB T-RFLP
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献43

  • 1朱衡,瞿峰,朱立煌.利用氯化苄提取适于分子生物学分析的真菌 DNA[J].真菌学报,1994,13(1):34-40. 被引量:306
  • 2王银改.ImageJ软件在检验医学图像分析处理中的应用[J].中华检验医学杂志,2005,28(7):747-748. 被引量:23
  • 3皮向荣,赵长新,邱然,张天雪.青稞萌发中两种淀粉酶的研究[J].酿酒科技,2005(12):60-62. 被引量:1
  • 4龙杰,孙军勇,陆健.微生物对麦芽品质的影响[J].啤酒科技,2007(1):13-16. 被引量:9
  • 5Van Nierop S N E, Rautenbach M. The impact of microorganisms on barley and malt quality-A review[J]. American So- ciety of Brewing Chemists, 2006 (64) :69-- 78.
  • 6Booysens C, Disk L M,Meijering I, et al. Isolation, identification and changes in the composition of lactic acid bacteria during the malting of two different barley cultivars[J]. Int J Food Microblol, 2002, 76: 63--73.
  • 7Hudec K. Influence of harvest date and geographical location on kernel symptoms, fungal infestation and embryo viability of malting barley[J]. Int J Food Mierobiol, 2007, 113(2): 125--132.
  • 8Laitila A, Kotaviita E, Peltola P, et al. Indigenous microbial community of barley greatly influences grain germination and malt quality[J]. J Inst Brew, 2007, 113(1): 9--20.
  • 9Vaughan V, O'Sullivan T, van Sinderen D. Enhancing the microbiological stability of malt and beer-A review[J]. J lnst Brew, 2005, 111(4): 355--371.
  • 10Gales P W. A Comparison of visual turbidity with turbidity measured by commercially available instruments[J]. J Am Soc Brew Chem, 2000, 58(3): 101--107.

共引文献16

同被引文献26

引证文献4

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部