期刊文献+

从形式判断到实质判断:CISG与PICC根本违约条款之比较研究

The comparison of CISG with PICC in fundamental breach of contract from formal judgment to substantial judgment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 CISG之下根本违约规则的立法变迁和解释原则体现出根本违约之认定由形式判断向实质判断的转变。PICC吸收借鉴了CISG的实质损害判断标准,并将其作为需要特别考虑的因素之一。通过案例法的分析,可以发现实质损害标准不论是在CISG还是在PICC中都发挥着十分重要的作用,并且在未来将继续占据主导地位。 The legislative changes and interpretation principles reflect the transformation in the standard of fundamental breach of contract under the CISG from formal judgment to substantial judgment. PICC absorbs the substantial detriment standard from CISG, but merely takes it as one of those factors that need special consideration. Through the analysis of case law, it can be found that the material damage standard plays a very important role in both CISG and PICC, and will surely maintain its dominance in the future.
作者 殷涛 YIN Tao(Suzhou University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215000, China)
机构地区 苏州大学
出处 《闽西职业技术学院学报》 2019年第2期15-19,107,共6页 Journal of Minxi Vocational and Technical College
关键词 CISG 根本违约规则 PICC 实质损害标准 CISG standard of fundamental breach of contract PICC substantial detriment standard

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部