摘要
高闶博通经史,尤精于《春秋》,所撰《春秋集注》为学者所推重。然于众多注疏本一样,《春秋集注》也存在着一些征引失当、考论不精之处。但瑕不掩瑜,在宋代诸经解中,《春秋集注》仍以其独到的见解,在经学史上占有一席之地。
Gao Kang was specialized in researching classics, especially in the study of Chunqiu. However, the great annotation of Chunqiu, which is he’s copyright, still exists several problems should be discussed deeply. Of course, Gao had a lot of his own ideas about the imperial examination system and the talent training system, and in the song dynasty and Ming states produced quite a wide range of cultural influences, for him and his studies of work is of high value.
作者
张伟
陈曙鹏
ZHANG Wei;CHEN Shu-peng(Faculty of Humanities and Media, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China)
出处
《宁波大学学报(人文科学版)》
2019年第4期17-20,共4页
Journal of Ningbo University:Liberal Arts Edition
基金
宁波市浙东文化研究基地项目“浙东文化精神与当代价值研究”(JD14ZW02)
关键词
宋代
高闶
《春秋集注》
正误
the Song Dynasty
Gao Kang
Chunqiu Notes
correcting faults