期刊文献+

本土化ClimateQUALTM历时稳定性分析——以北京地区高校图书馆为例 被引量:1

Analysis of the Diachronic Stability of the Localized ClimateQUALTM: A Case Study of the Universities in Beijing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以北京地区图书馆为例,分析本土化ClimateQUALTM的历时稳定性。对北京地区不同层次、不同类别的六所高校图书馆,采用同一问卷于2016年与2018年进行两次测试,运用结构方程模型分析方法,对两组数据分别进行项目分析、探索性因素分析、验证性因素分析,确认2016年量表和2018年量表,检验两个量表的差异。结果显示,2018年本土化图书馆组织氛围量表62.5%测量变量与2016年量表相同,量表具有一定稳定性。组织氛围建构变化、测量方法本身的不稳定性导致测量变量与潜在变量强弱关系的改变,是组织氛围量表变化的主要原因。测量量表随着组织变化而变化是合理的,测量量表作为社会科学量化研究的工具是要不断修订的。 Taking the libraries in Beijing as an example, the paper analyses the diachronic stability of localized ClimateQUALTM. Six university libraries at different levels and categories in Beijing were tested twice with the same questionnaire in 2016 and 2018. Using structural equation model analysis method, the paper carries out item analysis, exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis of the two groups of data respectively. The differences between the 2016 scale and the 2018 scale were confirmed, and the differences between the two scales were tested. The results show that 62.5% of the variables measured by the Organizational Climate Scale of Localized Libraries in 2018 are the same as those in 2016, and the scale is stable. The main reasons for the change of organizational climate scale are the change of the structure of organizational climate and the instability of measurement methods, which lead to the change of the relationship between measurement variables and potential variables. It is reasonable that the scale changes with the change of organization. As a tool of quantitative research in social sciences, the scale should be revised continuously.
作者 万云芳 WAN Yun-fang(Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)
机构地区 北京工业大学
出处 《大学图书情报学刊》 2019年第4期94-98,共5页 Journal of Academic Library and Information Science
关键词 图书馆组织氛围 ClimateQUALTM 本土化 稳定性分析 评估 library organizational climate climateQUAL TM localization stability analysis evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献95

  • 1陈维政,李金平.组织气候研究回顾及展望[J].外国经济与管理,2005,27(8):18-25. 被引量:54
  • 2李明子.现代管理的新理念——流程管理[J].中华护理杂志,2005,40(12):956-958. 被引量:224
  • 3李晔,刘华山.问卷调查过程中的常见问题与解决办法[J].教育研究与实验,2006(2):61-64. 被引量:28
  • 4岳澎,郑立明,郑峰.流程管理的定义、本质和战略目标[J].商业研究,2006(9):45-49. 被引量:39
  • 5Argyris, C. (1958). Some problems in conceptualizing organ- izational climate: A case study of a bank. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2, 501-520.
  • 6Ashforth, B. E. (1985). Climate formation: Issues and ext- ensions. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 837-847.
  • 7Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-indepen- dence, and reliability. In K. J. Kline & S. W. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in org- anizations (pp. 349 -381). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • 8Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury, CA: Sage.
  • 9Campbell, J., & Pritchard, R. (1969). Organizational climate questionnaire: Experimental form (Unpublished paper). University of Minnesota.
  • 10Colquitt, J. A., Noe, R. A., & Jackson, C. L. (2002). Justice in teams: Antecedents and consequences of procedural justice climate. Personnel Psychology, 55, 83-109.

共引文献84

同被引文献36

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部