期刊文献+

网约车平台的法律定位及责任承担之探讨 被引量:2

A Discussion of Legal Positioning and Liability Undertaking of Online Car-hailing Platform
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近年来,共享经济的蓬勃发展,对民众的日常生活产生了极大的影响。以网约车为例,一方面其使得社会资源得到充分利用,提高了经济效益;另一方面却由于立法对网约车平台的法律定位不清晰,导致发生事故后网约车平台和司机间相互推卸责任,受害者维权困难。通过对交通部颁布的《网络预约出租汽车经营服务管理暂行办法》进行剖析,认为该规章中将网约车平台定位为承运人,承担与传统出租车公司相同的责任不太稳妥,不利于新兴经济形态的发展,应在法律上赋予其特殊承运人的地位。网约车平台与司机之间应界定为劳务关系较为合适,面对司机或第三人对乘客的侵权行为应首先由平台承担赔付责任,若司机故意或重大过失则由平台与司机承担连带责任。 In recent years, the vigorous development of shared economy has had a great impact on the daily life of the civilians. Taking online car-hailing as an example, on the one hand, it makes full use of social resources and improves economic benefits, and on the other hand, in judicial practice the unclear legal positioning of the online car-hailing platform in legislation has led to mutual shirking of responsibility between the platform and drivers after an accident, which makes it difficult for the victims to safeguard their rights. Based on the analysis of the Interim Measures for the Management of Network Reservation Taxi Operating Service promulgated by the Ministry of Communications, this article observes that the regulation’ s positioning the network reservation taxi platform as a carrier is not safe to assume the same responsibilities as the traditional taxi companies, which is not conducive to the development of emerging economic forms, and should give it the status of a special carrier in law. The relationship between the platform and the driver should be defined as a more appropriate labor relationship. In the face of the infringement of the driver or the third party on the passengers, it is the platform who should firstly bear the liability for compensation. If the driver intentionally commits fault or even serious fault, the platform and the driver should bear joint liability.
作者 李皎 Li Jiao(School of Law, Fujian Normal University,Fuzhou, Fujian 350100, China)
出处 《湖北工程学院学报》 2019年第4期95-99,共5页 Journal of Hubei Engineering University
关键词 网约车平台 法律定位 承运人 责任承担 online car-hailing platform legal positioning carrier liability undertaking
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献51

  • 1钟华生.共享经济模式探索[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1994,31(6):44-48. 被引量:6
  • 2程秀波.消费主义及其伦理困境[J].河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2004,31(5):77-80. 被引量:21
  • 3蔡威:《五中全会公报首提“分享经济”——互联网新商业模式迎来发展契机》,载人民网,2015-11-04.
  • 4查丽华、范围:《美国加州劳动委员会关于优步与司机的劳动争议裁决》,载爱微帮网,2015.
  • 5弓长颖:《Uber又给监管出难题,司机到底算员工还是合作伙伴?》,载36Kr网,2015-03-16.
  • 6何敏:《网络预约出租汽车经营服务管理暂行办法征意见》,载中国新闻网,2015-10-10.
  • 7李路:《普华永道:十年内全球共享经济将增长20倍》,载腾讯科技网,2015-04-15.
  • 8Robot:《滴滴份额超Uber十倍移动出行市场格局尘埃落定》,载中国新闻网,2015.
  • 9王宇颖.自主治理:中国农民合作经济组织的路径选择[J].特区经济,2008(7):170-171. 被引量:4
  • 10唐兵.公共资源的特性与治理模式分析[J].重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版),2009,21(1):111-116. 被引量:17

共引文献450

同被引文献4

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部