期刊文献+

琉球的领土地位与自决权

Territorial Status and Self-Determination of the Ryukyu Islands
下载PDF
导出
摘要 自决权是一项国际法基本原则和重要的集体人权,虽然颇具争议性和敏感性,但有一点在传统层面上却是存在共识的,那就是殖民地、托管领土与非自治领土的人民享有自决权。学理上,这种自决权也被称为"殖民主义自决权""古典自决权"或“传统自决权”。琉球地位问题肇始于1879年的“琉球处分”,二战以后琉球的领土地位获得了重新处分的契机,却先后因1951年的《旧金山和约》和1971年的《关于琉球与大东群岛的协定》而被搁置。于是琉球被先后置于美国和日本的管理之下。琉球作为潜在的托管领土,其人民享有无可争议的传统自决权。琉球人民要求琉球独立或并入邻国都不涉及分离主义、分裂主义等争议事项。 The right to self-determination is a fundamental principle enshrined by international law as well as an equally important collective human right. What this principle exactly stands for and entails has always been controversial and sensitive. However, despite potential controversy, there has been consensus in a traditional sense that people living in colonial, trust and non-self-governing territories arc entitled to the right to self-determination. In the doctrines of law, the right to self-determination is also referred to as the “colonial self-determination”,“traditional self-determination”or “classical self-determination”. The status of the Ryukyu Islands has been a contentious issue since 1879, when the ^Disposition of Ryukyu” was implemented. In the aftermath of World War II,there was an opportunity to deal with the issue on the Ryukyu Islands. As the U.S. won over Japan, the 1951 Treaty of Peace with Japan and 1971 Agreement between the United States of America and Japan Concerning the Ryukyu Islands and the Daito Islands established the basis for the aforementioned States to successively share the control of both. The Ryukyu Islands, qualifying as a trust territory, enable its inhabitants to claim the right to self-determination. So that, if the people from the Ryukyu Islands demand independence from their administering States or incorporation into a neighboring State, this demand would not count as an act of as separatism or splittism.
作者 罗欢欣 HUANG Yuxin LIN Fenglai LUO Huanxin
出处 《中华海洋法学评论》 2019年第2期1-71,共71页 China Oceans Law Review
关键词 琉球 冲绳 领土地位 自决权 托管 the Ryukyu Islands Okinawa Territorial status Selfdetermination Trusteeship
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献8

  • 1《佐藤、尼克松共同声明》.
  • 2《日美安保共同宣言》.
  • 3《努力促进中日关系正常化》,《人民日报》,1955年10月19日.
  • 4罗欢欣.《海内外钓鱼岛研究四十年:比较与述评》,载《日本蓝皮书:日本研究报告(2013)》,北京:社会科学文献出版社,2013年,第128-156页.
  • 5丘宏达.《琉球问题研究》,《政法大学评论》1970年第2期,第1-12页.
  • 6《美帝霸占我领土台湾的罪行必须清算》.《人民日报》,1971年6月28日.
  • 7丘宏达.《从国际法观点论钓鱼台列屿问题》,载中国国民党中央委员会第四组编.《钓鱼台列屿问题资料汇编》,第160页.
  • 8罗欢欣.论琉球在国际法上的地位[J].国际法研究,2014(1):5-28. 被引量:11

共引文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部