期刊文献+

亚投行投资争端解决机制研究——基于对亚投行投资创新模式的思考

Research on the Settlement Mechanism of Investment Dispute of AIIB——Reflections on the Investment Innovation Model of AIIB
下载PDF
导出
摘要 亚投行的投资发展规模不断壮大,与此同时也面临现有金融体系的约束、与现有多边金融机构存在业务竞争、地缘政治等问题。对此,亚投行应该实行多元化投资、通过下设国际金融公司的方式发展私营模式、在联合融资的基础上发展壮大独立融资项目。另外,投资发展必然面临投资争端,但现有的投资争端解决机制受美国等发达国家干预、透明度不高、争端双方利益不平衡、仲裁裁决存在不确定性等问题,也与亚投行的投资发展不匹配。对此,应依托亚投行建立亚投行投资争端解决机制,在建立时应制定完善的规则体系、符合亚投行的投资特点、构建与我国国内仲裁实践相互配合的新模式。 The investment of AIIB keeps growing in scale, but at the same time, facing constraints of the existing financial system, business competition with existing multilateral financial institutions and geopolitical issues, the AIIB should diversify its investment, develop a private model through an international financial corporation, and grow independent financing projects on the basis of joint financing. In addition, investment development is bound to face investment disputes, but due to intervention by the United States and other developed countries, existing settlement mechanism of investment dispute suffers low transparency, uneven interests of both parties in disputes, and uncertainty of arbitration, which make it unmatched with the investment development of AIIB. In this regard, it is necessary for us to establish settlement mechanism of investment dispute relying on the AIIB, and develop a sound rule system in line with the investment characteristics of the AIIB and a new model of cooperation with China’s domestic arbitration practice.
作者 陈云东 宋子文 Chen Yun-dong;Song Zi-wen(Law School,Yunnan University,Kunming 650504,China)
机构地区 云南大学法学院
出处 《洛阳师范学院学报》 2019年第6期51-56,共6页 Journal of Luoyang Normal University
基金 国家社科基金项目(17BFX013)
关键词 亚投行 一带一路 投资模式创新 CIETAC投资争端 AIIB One Belt, One Road investment model innovation CIETAC investment dispute
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献68

  • 1王虎华,罗国强.《联合国国家及其财产管辖豁免公约》规则的性质与适用[J].政治与法律,2007(1):34-38. 被引量:23
  • 2[英]伊恩·布朗利著 曾令良 余教友译.《国际公法原理》[M].法律出版社,2003年8月版.第785.
  • 3周鲠生.《国际法》(上册)[M].商务印书馆,1981年版.第199页.
  • 4FG Hemisphere Associates LLC v. Democratic Republic of the Congo [2009] 1 HKLRD 410.
  • 5FG Hemisphere Associates LLC v. Democratic Republic of the Congo [2010] 2 HKLRD 66.
  • 6FG Hemisphere Associates LLC v. Democratic Republic of the Cong, FACV 5 - 7/2010 ( On appeal from CACV 373/2005 & 43/2009).
  • 7Mr. Franz Sedelmayer v. The Russian Federation, Ad hoc Arbitral Award, IIC 106 (1998), Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce.
  • 8The Russian Federation v. Franz J. Sedelmayer, Case No. O 170-10, given in Stockholm on 1 July 2011.
  • 9Libyan American Oil Company (LIAMCO) v. Socialist People' s Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, 482 F. Supp. 1175, 1178 (DDC 1980).
  • 10Ministry of Def. and Support for the Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran v. Cubic Def. Sys. , 385 F. 3d 1206 (2004), vacated on other grounds, 546 U. S. 450 (2006).

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部