期刊文献+

腹腔镜尾侧入路治疗右半结肠癌的效果及对血清CEA、CA199的影响 被引量:16

Laparoscopic approach for the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma and its effect on serum CEA and CA199
下载PDF
导出
摘要 探讨腹腔镜尾侧入路治疗右半结肠癌的手术方法及对患者血清癌胚抗原(CEA)、糖类抗原199(CA199)水平的影响。选取我院2015年1月—2017年12月手术治疗的95例右半结肠癌患者,根据手术入路分为A组(腹腔镜尾侧入路法)47例、B组(腹腔镜中间入路法)48例,比较两种方法的手术效果、并发症及术后血清CEA、CA199水平。A组手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间均显著低于B组(P<0.05);A组和B组淋巴结清扫数目、术后肛门排气时间、拔出引流管时间、切除标本长度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);A组手术并发症率(8.51%)低于B组(14.58%),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);术前、术后两组血清CEA、CA199水平比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后两组血清CEA、CA199水平较本组术前均显著降低(P<0.05)。腹腔镜尾侧入路治疗右半结肠癌较中间入路具有手术操作简单、术中出血量少的优点,同时可降低血清CEA、CA199水平。
作者 安宏超 崔宏力 李华志 杨志勇 AN Hong-chao;CUI Hong-li;LI Hua-zhi
出处 《中国现代普通外科进展》 CAS 2019年第6期478-480,共3页 Chinese Journal of Current Advances in General Surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献136

  • 1金留根,费伯健,王卫理,许示心,曹华祥,蒋晖,许洪卫,何平.完整结肠系膜切除在右半结肠癌根治术中的应用研究[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2012,6(16):4949-4950. 被引量:4
  • 2Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, et al. Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation--technical notes and outcome [ J ]. Colorectal Dis, 2009, 11 (4) :354-364.
  • 3Kye BH, Kim JG, Cho HM, et al. The effect of laparoscopic surgery in stage Ⅱ and Ⅲ right-sided colon cancer: a retrospective study [ J ]. World J Surg Oncol, 2012, 10 (2) : 89-100.
  • 4West NP, Hohenberger W, Weber K, et al. Complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation produces an oncologically superior specimen compared with standard surgery for carcinoma of the colon [J]. J Clin Oncol,2010,28(2) :272-278.
  • 5Kitano S, Kitajima M, Konishi F, et al. A muhicenter study on laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in Japan [ J ]. Surg Endosc ,2006,20 (9) : 1348-1352.
  • 6易琨,李睿舒.腹腔镜与传统开腹术治疗结肠癌的临床疗效分析[J].中外健康文摘,2014(13):170-171.
  • 7Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, et al. Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from theCOST Group trial[J]. Ann Surg, 2007,246(4):655-662.
  • 8Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, et al. Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically as- sisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer [J]. Br J Surg, 2010,97( 11 ):1638-1645.
  • 9Guo DY, Eteuati J, Nguyen MH, et al. Laparoscopic assisted colec- tomy: experience form a rural centre [J]. Anz J Surg, 2007,77 (4): 283-286.
  • 10Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, et al. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomized trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2005,6 (7):477-484.

共引文献250

同被引文献171

引证文献16

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部