期刊文献+

开腹直肠癌根治术与腹腔镜直肠癌手术治疗直肠癌老年患者的疗效对比 被引量:4

Comparison of curative effect between radical resection of open rectal cancer and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery in elderly patients with rectal cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较开腹直肠癌根治术与腹腔镜直肠癌根治术对于老年直肠癌患者的疗效。方法以2014年3月—2019年3月行手术治疗的46例老年直肠癌患者为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分成腹腔镜组和开腹组各23例,比较2组患者的手术情况以及术后发生并发症情况。结果腹腔镜组患者的各项手术情况都显著优于开腹组,且腹腔镜组患者在术后出现并发症的概率也要明显低于开腹组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论相较于开腹直肠癌手术,腹腔镜直肠癌手术的治疗效果更好,有利于老年患者的术后恢复,值得在临床中推广使用。 Objective To compare the curative effect of radical resection of open rectal cancer and laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer in elderly patients with rectal cancer.Methods 46 elderly patients with rectal cancer from March 2014 to March 2019 were randomly divided into laparoscopy group(n=23)and open group(n=23). Two groups of patients were treated with corresponding surgical methods. The operative and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.Results the operative status of the laparoscopic group was significantly better than that of the open group,and the incidence of postoperative complications in the laparoscopic group was significantly lower than that in the open group,and there was a significant difference in the data between the two groups,and the postoperative complications in the laparoscopic group were significantly lower than those in the laparotomy group,and there were significant differences between the two groups. There was statistical significance(P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with open rectal surgery,laparoscopic rectal surgery is more effective in the treatment of rectal cancer. In addition,minimally invasive operation is more conducive to postoperative recovery of elderly patients,and is worth popularizing in clinical practice.
作者 周春柳 王昕 曹烽 Zhou Chunliu;Wang Xin;Cao Feng(The Third People's Hospital of Jingdezhen City,Jingdezhen,Jiangxi 333000)
出处 《基层医学论坛》 2019年第22期3111-3112,共2页 The Medical Forum
基金 腹腔镜手术在治疗老年直肠癌患者中的优势研究(20171SFZC036)
关键词 直肠癌 老年患者 腹腔镜直肠癌手术 开腹直肠癌根治术 疗效 Carcinoma of the rectum Elderly patients Laparoscopic rectal surgery Radical resection of open rectal cancer Curative effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献25

  • 1Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery-the clue to pelvic recurrence [J]. Br J Surg,1982,69 : 613-616.
  • 2Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, et al. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcome of a randomised trim [ J 1- Lancet Oncol, 2005,6 : 477-484.
  • 3Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group, Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, et al. Survival after laparoscopic versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomized clinical trial[J]. Lancet Oneol, 2009, 10 : 44-52.
  • 4Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, et al. Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2007,25 : 3061-3068.
  • 5Ng SS, Leung KL, Lee JF, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted versus open abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial [Jl. Ann Surg Oncol, 2008,15: 2418 -2425.
  • 6Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, et al. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiothepapy (COREAN trial):short-term outcomes of an open-label randomized controlled trial[J1. Lancet Oncol, 2010, 11 : 637-645.
  • 7Lujan J, Valero G, Biondo S, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: results of a prospective multicentre analysisi of 4970 patients[J1. Surg Endose, 2013,27:295-302.
  • 8. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional vez,sus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): muhicentre, randomized controlled trial[J 1. Lancet, 2005,365 : 1718-1726.
  • 9van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II ):short -term outcomes of a randomized, phase 3 trial [Jl. Lancet oncol, 2013,14 : 210-218.
  • 10Nagtegall ID, Marijnen CA, Kranenbarg EK, et al. Circumferential margin involvement is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma: not one millimeter but two millimeters is the limit[J]. Am J Surg, Pathol, 2002,26: 350-357.

共引文献89

同被引文献40

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部