“批量公民个人信息”不真实性的证明责任主体探究

Research on the responsibility subject of proof of “batch citizen’s personal information”

《关于办理侵犯公民个人信息刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》第11条第3款规定了批量信息的认定规则,但对于证明信息不真实的证明责任应该由谁承担,条文并未明晰。目前关于批量信息不真实性的证明主体存在公诉机关、被告人、法官三种观点,从立法目的和司法实践的经验看,将批量信息不真实性的证明责任以推定方式转移给被告人承担兼具合理性与合法性,但该条款对推定的适用需要以公诉机关对批量信息的抽样调查为前提。

Article 11(3) of the“Interpretation of Certain Issues Concerning Criminal Infringement of Citizen’ s Personal Information”stipulates rules for the determination of batch information, but the information is not true clear to show who should bear the burden of proof that there is evidence to prove that .At present, there are three viewpoints on the subject of the untruthfulness of bulk information: public prosecutors, defendants, and judges. Judging from the legislative objectives and the experience of judicial practice, the burden of proof of the untruthfulness of bulk information is transferred to the defendant in a presumed manner. Rationality and legitimacy, but the application of presumption in this clause requires the premise of a sample survey of bulk informa? Tion by the prosecution.