期刊文献+

教学性知识:教师社会地位的基础 被引量:1

Teaching Knowledge: The Basis of Teachers’ Social Status
下载PDF
导出
摘要 如何才能有效且有针对性地提高教师的社会地位?既定教师政策逻辑依循的是经典社会学理论“权力、经济与声望”的判断维度,而缺乏对“教师获得社会地位的基础是什么”,抑或“教师社会地位由什么决定”等前置性问题的思考,以致支持性政策层级累加,但教师地位的窘境依旧。对“教师何以存在”“教师职业何以分层”和“教师社会地位的决定性因素是什么”等三大问题的学理考察可以发现:知识是教师职业存在的根基,教学性知识是教师职业分层的依据,而稀缺性教学性知识则是教师社会地位的决定因素。因此,现有教师政策在持续改善薪酬待遇等外在条件的同时,还应着力提升教师的教学性知识。 How can we effectively and specifically improve the social status of teachers?The logic of established teacher policy follows the judgment dimensions of the classical sociological theory“power,economy and prestige”,but does not think much about the prepositional problems such as“what is the basis for teachers to obtain social status”and“what determines the social status of teachers”.As a result,the supportive policies have been formulated cumulatively,but the dilemma of teachers’social status remains.The scientific investigation of the three major problems of“why do teachers exist”,“why is the teaching profession stratified”and“what is the decisive factor of teachers’social status”finds that knowledge is the foundation of the teaching profession,teaching knowledge is the basis of the teaching profession stratification,and scarce teaching knowledge is the decisive factor for teachers’social status.Therefore,the existing teacher policy should focus on improving teachers’teaching knowledge in addition to continuous improvement of remuneration and other external conditions.
作者 周兆海 ZHOU Zhao-hai(School of Education,Shaanxi Normal University,Xi’an Shaanxi 710062,China)
出处 《教师发展研究》 2019年第2期81-86,共6页 Teacher Development Research
基金 陕西省教育科学“十三五”规划2016年度课题“人口向城流动背景下陕西农村教师职业吸引力问题研究”(SGH16B009) 陕西师范大学教师教育课题“基础教育学校校长管理素质培养”(JSJY2018007) 陕西师范大学田家炳基金会项目“学校优质化建设的动力结构与转换机制研究”(SXTJB201702)
关键词 教学性知识 教师社会地位 教师职业 teaching knowledge teacher's social status teaching profession
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献75

  • 1徐玮.论科塞功能冲突论及其安全阀理论在我国的应用[J].广西青年干部学院学报,2007,17(4):67-69. 被引量:10
  • 2Auerbach, Jerold S. 1976, Unequal Justice : lawyers and Social Change in Modern America. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • 3Becker, Howard S, 1962, "The Nature of a Profession," in Education for the Professions, Chieago:National Society for the Study of Education. Reprinted in Becker, H. S. (1970) Sociological Work.Chicago: Aldine.
  • 4Berlant, Jeffrey L. 1975, Profession and Monopoly: A Study of Medicine in the United States and Great Britain. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • 5Bledstein, Burton J. 1976, The Culture of Professionalism : The Middle Class and the Development of Higher Education in America. New York: Norton.
  • 6Burrage, Michael 1989, "Revolution as a Starting Point for the Comparative Analysis of the French, American, and English Legal Professions." in Lawyers in Society, vol. 3, Comparative Theories, (eds.)by R. L. Abel & P. S. C. Lewis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • 7Burrage, Michael & Rolf Torstendahl (eds.) 1990, Professions in Theory and History: Rethinking the Study of the Professions. London: Sage.
  • 8Caplow, Theodore 1954, The Sociology of Work. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • 9Carr-Saunders, Alexander M. & P. A. Wilson 1933. The Professions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 10Cocks, Geoffrey & Konrad H.Jarausch (eds.) 1990, German Professions, 1800 - 1950. New York: Oxford University Press.

共引文献173

同被引文献3

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部