中国国际民事管辖权的立法体例研究

The Legislative System of China’s International Civil Jurisdiction: Theory and Practice

二战后,国际民事管辖权在立法体例上逐渐形成一元论体例与二元论体例双足鼎立的局面。一元论体例主张通过援引国内地域管辖权规则来解决国际民事管辖权问题,其法理依据在于类推适用(准用)。但基于一元论体例的形式主义特点,为确保国际民事管辖权实质正义之实现,需要为其配备校正机制。鉴于一元论体例拥有充分的法理依据,其完全可以成为我国国际民事管辖权立法体例的未来选项。我国未来如继续采用一元论体例,则必须重视该体例的校正机制配置工作。

After World War Ⅱ a dualism of legislative pattern for international civil jurisdiction is showing up in the world. Monistic legislative pattern argues that international civil jurisdiction shoud be determined by referring to the rules of national territorial jurisdiction. The legal ground for monistic pattern is application by analogy. But just because of its formalistic approach, the monistic pattern should be equipped with a correction mechanism to make sure that material justice of international civil jurisdiction be realised. As having a sound legal ground, monistic pattern is eligible for future legislative pattern of international civil jurisdiction in China, and if so, it should be paid more attention to improve the correction mechanism.