摘要
王国维论证司马迁生年,真正的证据是认为孔安国与董仲舒是司马迁的老师与长辈。他的论证是虚构的,司马迁学识出自家学,并非儒家弟子,把孔安国、董仲舒作为论证史公生年的证据不能成立,从而彻底否认王国维的推论。所谓“伪《尚书》序”记述的孔安国是真实的,与史实相符。
Wang Guowei argues that when Sima Qian was born,the real evidence is that Kong Anguo and Dong Zhongshu are the teachers and elders of Sima Qian.This paper thinks that his argument is fictitious.Sima Qian learned to study at home,not a Confucian disciple.The evidence that Kong Anguo and Dong Zhongshu were used to justify the history of the birth cannot be established,thus completely denying Wang Guowei’s inference.It is further pointed out that Kong Anguo,described in the“preface of bogus Shangshu”,is true and consistent with historical facts.
作者
张韩荣
ZHANG Han-rong(Hancheng Sima Qian Association,Hancheng 715400,China)
出处
《渭南师范学院学报》
2019年第7期13-17,共5页
Journal of Weinan Normal University
关键词
王国维
董仲舒
孔安国
伪《尚书》序
Wang Guowei
Dong Zhongshu
Kong Anguo
preface to the bogus Shangshu