摘要
文章主要针对佳木斯大学地理科学专业必修课“环境学概论”的课程成绩评定进行研究。文章根据学生问卷结果与专业教师访谈确定“环境学概论”课程过程性评价指标要素;通过层次分析法建立合作学习模式下“环境学概论”课程过程性评价指标体系。结果表明:在合作学习模式下“环境学概论”课程的过程性评价中,学生评价与教师评价应占总评价的比重应为2:3;在过程性评价要素“五位一体”中,知识的权重最高,其权重为0.50,其次能力的权重最高,其权重为0.32,而技能、态度与行为的权重持平,均为0.06;在指标层中的过程性评价要素,权重排名前三位的依次是期末考试、协作能力和沟通能力,其中,期末考试的权重为0.36,协作能力与沟通能力的权重并列,均为0.10。权重排在最后的是电脑操作和教具使用,权重均为0.01。
This study mainly focuses on the evaluation of the course performance of the compulsory course“Introduction to Environmental Science”for Geographic Science Major of Jiamusi University. According to the results of students’ questionnaires and the interview with the professional teachers, the process evaluation index elements of the course “Introduction to Environmental Science”are determined, and the process evaluation index system of the course “Introduction to Environmental Science”under the mode of cooperative learning is established by analytic hierarchy process. The results show that: In the process evaluation of the course“Introduction to Environmental Science”under the cooperative learning mode, the proportion of student evaluation and teacher evaluation should be 2∶3. In the process evaluation element“five in one”, the weight of knowledge is the highest, and its weight is 0.50. Secondly, the weight of ability is the highest, and its weight is 0.32, and the weight of skills, attitude and behavior is equal, all of which are 0.06. In the index level, the top three weights are final examination, collaborative ability and communication ability, in which the weights of final examination are 0.36, and the weights of collaborative ability and communication ability are 0.10. At the end of the weights are computer operation and tool use, and the weights are 0.01.
作者
顾成林
陈季
杨绪华
Gu Chenglin;Chen Ji;Yang Xuhua(School of Science, Jiamusi University, Jiamusi City, Heilongjiang 154007, China)
出处
《江苏科技信息》
2019年第17期65-68,共4页
Jiangsu Science and Technology Information
基金
黑龙江省教育科学规划课题
项目名称:合作学习模式下的高校环境学课程过程性评价研究
项目编号:GBB1317128
关键词
环境学概论
成绩评定
过程性评价
层次分析法
introduction to environmental science
achievement assessment
process assessment
analytic hierarchy process