期刊文献+

抉择中的土地流转与土地托管:优劣之分还是条件差异? 被引量:17

The Choice of Land Transfer and Land Trusteeship: The Difference between Good and Bad or Conditional Difference?
下载PDF
导出
摘要 规模经营水平是决定农业经营方式转变的关键。近年来,随着土地规模经营推进难度的加大,以土地托管为代表的服务规模经营的作用越发突出,理论界更是出现了土地托管优于土地流转的论断。已有研究及实地调研案例表明:首先,土地托管和土地流转这两种模式间仅存在适用性差别,而不存在绝对优劣之分;其次,总结以往土地政策实施结果的经验教训,得出在推动农业规模化经营与其经营模式选择方面,应采取因地制宜的态度,避免运动式、“一刀切”的政策做法,为农地规模经营的有效推进提供良好的制度环境。 The scale of operation is the key to determining the transformation of agricultural management methods.In recent years, along with the difficulty of promoting the scale operation of land, the role of service scale operation represented by land custody in promoting the scale operation of agriculture has become more and more prominent. In the theoretical circle, the argument has emerged that land trusteeship is superior to land transfer. Based on the researches and field research cases, the study found that:First, there is only a difference in applicability between the two modes of land custody and land transfer, and there is no absolute superiority and inferiority;Second, the lessons learned from the implementation results of the previous land policies are summarized, and the large-scale operation of agriculture and its business model are drawn. In terms of choice, we should adapt to the local situations. To avoid a sporty, "one size fits all" policy approach is an important guarantee for providing a good institutional environment for the effective promotion of land scale management.
作者 武舜臣 曹丹丘 李乾 Wu Shunchen;Cao Danqiu;Li Qian(China Institute for Rural Studies,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084;College of Economics and Management,China Agricultural University,Beijing 100083,China)
出处 《江苏大学学报(社会科学版)》 北大核心 2019年第4期58-66,76,共10页 Journal of Jiangsu University(Social Science Edition)
基金 国家社会科学基金青年项目(18CJY035) 国家自然科学基金青年项目(71503119) 博士后科学基金面上资助项目(2018M631509) 首都流通业研究基地资助(JD-ZD-2018-004)
关键词 农业规模经营 经营模式 土地流转 土地托管 agricultural scale management land transfer land trusteeship comparative analysis policy enlightenment
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

二级参考文献294

共引文献1411

同被引文献276

引证文献17

二级引证文献103

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部