期刊文献+

开腹与腹腔镜广泛子宫切除术对宫颈癌患者生活质量的影响 被引量:25

Quality of life in cervical cancer survivors after radical hysterectomy via laparoscopy or laparotomy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较开腹与腹腔镜广泛子宫切除术后宫颈癌患者生活质量的差异。方法选取2017年10月至2018年10月北京协和医院随诊的宫颈癌术后患者,采用欧洲癌症研究机构与治疗组织(EORTC)的生活质量测定量表(QLQ-C30)及宫颈癌特异性附加量表(QLQ-Cx24)对患者的生存质量进行评分。结果共纳入319例宫颈癌患者,262例接受了腹腔镜下广泛子宫切除术,57例接受开腹广泛子宫切除术。其中102例患者报告有泌尿系症状,68例报告有结直肠症状。腹腔镜组与开腹手术组患者的诊断年龄、卵巢保留以及术后辅助放疗情况无明显差异;QLQ-C30评价表得分显示,两组的总体生存质量量表项目得分分别为83.3(0~100)分和95.6(41.7~100)分,差异无统计学意义(P=0.931)。结论开腹广泛子宫切除术与腹腔镜下广泛子宫切除术后患者的远期生活质量相近。 Objective To study the difference between laparoscopic and open radical surgery in long-term quality of life(QOL)in cervical cancer survivors.Methods The patients with cervical cancer who were followed up in the Outpatient Department of Peking Union Medical College Hospital(PUMCH)from October 2017 to October 2018 were selected for life quality assessment by the EORTC questionnaires,QLQ-C30 and QLQ-Cx24.Results A total of 319 patients with primary cervical cancer were included in the study.Of all enrolled patients,262 underwent laparoscopic radical hysterectomy while 57 received laparotomy.All patients completed personal information survey,of which 102 patients reported urinary symptoms and 68 reported colorectal symptoms.There were no significant differences in the age of diagnosis,ovarian retention,and postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy between the laparoscopic and open surgery groups.The QLQ-C30 scores showed that the overall quality of life scale items for the laparoscopic and open group were 83.3(0-100)and 95.6(41.7-100)points,respectively,with no statistically significant difference between the two groups(P=0.931).Conclusion Laparoscopic and laparotomic radical hysterectomy are similar in long-term QOL in cervical cancer survivors.
作者 李文慧 吴鸣 谭先杰 LI Wenhui;WU Ming;TAN Xian-jie(Peking Union Medical College Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & PekingUnion Medical College,Beijing 100730,China)
出处 《中国实用妇科与产科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2019年第7期793-796,共4页 Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics
基金 国家自然科学基金(81172483)
关键词 宫颈肿瘤 开腹手术 腹腔镜手术 生活质量 cervical cancer laparotomy laparoscopy quality of life
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献20

  • 1沈铿,郎景和,杨佳欣,陈亦乐,向阳,华克勤,黄惠芳,潘凌亚,吴鸣,丰有吉.腹腔镜阴式广泛性子宫颈切除术治疗早期子宫颈癌的临床分析[J].中华妇产科杂志,2006,41(4):222-225. 被引量:47
  • 2Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM,et al. Global cancer statistics [J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2011,61 (2) : 69-90.
  • 3Lee YH, Choi KS, Lee HY, et al. Current status of the National Cancer Screening Program for cervical cancer in Korea,2009 [J]. J Gynecol Oncol, 2012,23 ( 1 ) : 16-21.
  • 4Siegel R,Ward E,Brawley O,et al. Cancer statistics,2011:the impact of eliminating socioeconomic and radical disparities on premature cancer deaths [J]. CA Cancer J Clin,2011,61 (4) :212- 236.
  • 5Plante M,Gregoire J,Renand MC,et al. The vaginal radical trachelectomy:an update of a series of 125 cases and 106 pregnancies[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2011,121 ( 2 ) : 290-297.
  • 6Pareja R, Rend6n GJ, Sanz-Lomana CM, et al. Surgical, oncological, and obstetrical outcomes after abdominal radical trachelectomy: a systematic literature review[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2013,131 ( 1 ) : 77- 82.
  • 7Nishio H,Fujii T,Sugiyama J,et al. Reproductive and obstetric outcomes after radical abdominal trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer in a series of 31 pregnancies[J]. Hum Reprod,2013,28 (7) : 1793-1798.
  • 8Shepherd JH, Spencer C, Herod J, et al. Radical vaginal traeheleetomy as a fertility-sparing procedure in women with early-stage cervical eancer-cumulative pregnancy rate in a series of 123 women[J]. B JOG, 2006,113(6) :719-724.
  • 9Plante M. Evolution in fertility-preserving options for early-stage cervical cancer:radical trachelectomy,simple trachelectomy,neoadjuvant chemotherapy[J]. Int J GynecoI Cancer, 2013,25 (6) : 982-989.
  • 10Regan L, Braude PR,Trembath PL. Influence of past reproductive performance on risk of spontaneous abortion [J]. BMJ,1989,299 (6698) :541-545.

共引文献138

同被引文献226

引证文献25

二级引证文献90

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部