期刊文献+

凶险性前置胎盘剖宫产119例临床分析 被引量:10

Clinical Analysis of 119 Cases of Pernicious Placenta Previa Caesarean Section
下载PDF
导出
摘要 【目的】探讨凶险性前置胎盘围术期处理方法。【方法】回顾性分析2012年1月至2018年12月首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院妇产科诊治的119例凶险性前置胎盘的患者临床资料,根据前置胎盘类型分为中央型前置胎盘组(中央型组)、非中央型前置胎盘组(非中央型组)。比较两组患者胎盘植入率、产后出血量、围术期输血量、手术时间及子宫切除率。【结果】中央型组胎盘植入率为36.8%( 35/95),明显高于非中央型组胎盘植入率的8.3 %(2/24);中央型组术中出血量为(1562±2253) mL,显著高于非中央型组的(637 ±1043)mL;中央型组围手术期输血率为38.9%(37/95),显著高于非中央型组的8.3%(2/24);中央型组患者手术时间(110±76)min,显著高于非中央组的(82.8±38)min,其差异均有统计学意义(P <0.05)。两组患者子宫切除率比较差异无统计学意义(P >0.05)。【结论】凶险性前置胎盘均有胎盘植入,且中央型发生率较高,出血及输血风险高。 [ Objective ] To investigate perioperative management of pernicious placenta previa.[Methods] The clinical data of 119 cases of pernicious placenta previa from January 2012 to December 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups: the completed placenta previa group and the noncentral type of pernicious placenta previa group. Placenta implantation rate, postpartum hemorrhage amount, perioperative blood transfusion volume, operation time and uterine resection rate were analyzed and compared between the two groups,[Results]Placental implantation rate in the central group was 36.8%(35/95), significantly higher than that in the non-central group 8.3%(2/24, P <0.01). Postpartum hemorrhage amount: The median value of postpartum hemorrhage amount was 800(200.16000)mL in the central group, the mean was 1562±2253 ml. and that in the non-central group was 300( 150.4000)mL and 637± 1043 mL, respectively. That of the central group was significantly higher than of the non-central group ( P <0.01). Perioperative blood transfusion: in the central group, the blood transfusion rate was 38.9%(37/95 ), while in the the non-central group, it was 8.3%(2/24). That of the central group was significantly higher than that of the noncentral group. Operation time: patients in the central group had significantly longer operative time (118± 76 min) than those in the non-central group (82.8±38 min)( P <0.05). There was no significant difference in uterine resection rate between the two groups.[Conclusion]Central type of pernicious placenta previa is more liable to acquire placenta increta, and the risk of hemorrhage and blood transfusion is higher than the non-central group.
作者 时晓 王木兰 路军丽 刘崇东 SHI Xiao;WANG Mu-lan;LU Jun-li(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital , Beijing 100020, China)
出处 《医学临床研究》 CAS 2019年第6期1106-1108,共3页 Journal of Clinical Research
关键词 前置胎盘/流行病学 剖宫产术 Placenta Previa/EP Cesarean Section
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献113

  • 1张力,李萍,何国琳,刘兴会,杨太珠,罗红,田雨.经腹彩色超声多普勒在前置胎盘并发胎盘植入诊断中的价值[J].中华妇产科杂志,2006,41(12):799-802. 被引量:154
  • 2应豪,阮晟鸣,王德芬.胎盘植入的诊治进展[J].实用妇产科杂志,2007,23(6):335-336. 被引量:243
  • 3郭万学.超声医学[M].6版.北京:人民军医出版社,2012:708-712.
  • 4谢幸,苟文丽.妇产科学[M].8版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:118-119.
  • 5Chattopadhyay SK,Kharif H,Sherbeeni MM.Placenta praevia and accrete after previous caesarean section[J].Eur J Obstet GynRB,1993,52(3):151-156.
  • 6Marshall NE,Fu R,Guise JM.Impact of multiple cesarean deliveries on maternal morbidity:a systematic review[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,2011,205(3):262.
  • 7Desai N,Krantz D,Roman A,et al.Elevated first trimester PAPP-A is associated with increased risk of placenta accreta[J].Prenat Diagn,2013 Nov 14.doi:10.1002.
  • 8Meng X,Xie L,Song W.Comparing the diagnostic value of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for placenta accreta:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Ultrasound Med Biol,2013,39(11):1958-1965.
  • 9Gagnon A,Wilson RD,Audibert F,et al.Obstetrical complications associated with abnormal maternal serum markers analytes[J].J Obstet Gynaecol Can,2008,30(10):918-949.
  • 10Wu S, Kocherginsky M, Hibbard JU. Abnormal placentation:twenty-year analysis[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2005,192(5):1458-1461.

共引文献240

同被引文献109

引证文献10

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部