虚假诉讼罪司法解释适用中的重点与难点问题研究——以“套路贷”案件为例

Study on Key and Difficult Problems in Judicial Interpretation of False Litigation Crime

“两高”最新司法解释针对虚假诉讼罪的行为方式、定罪量刑标准等方面进行了深入阐释,但司法实践中对于涉及虚假诉讼的疑难问题仍需进一步探讨。对虚假诉讼行为的认定需要考虑行为方式与后果两方面。“套路贷”与民间借贷存在本质区别,“套路贷”犯罪案件中以虚构民间借贷提起民事诉讼不属于“两高”最新司法解释中的“部分篡改型”,其符合虚假诉讼罪的本质特征。合理保障诉权与打击虚假诉讼犯罪应当并重,因此,有必要构建多层次、多梯次的虚假诉讼处理机制与公检法案件线索发现移送机制。

The Supreme People's court's and Supreme People's Procuratorate's judicial interpretation targeting the behaviors and methods of false litigation and conviction and sentencing criteria and etc.gives a further illustration.However,it is necessary to further discuss difficulty problems concerning false litigation in judicial practice.Both methods and consequences of the false litigation should be taken into consideration in deciding its behaviors."Routine Loan"and private lending differ in nature.In the former cases,when civil lawsuits are made in the name of fictitious private lending,they can't be categorized as"partial tampering type"in the judicial interpretation,but they match the essential characteristics of false litigation crime.Therefore,equal attention should be paid toreasonable protection of litigation rights and combating false litigation crime.It is necessary to establish multi-level,multi-tier mechanisms to deal with false litigation and mechanisms to transfer clues of such crime to police,procuratorates and courts.