期刊文献+

汉字类型理论研究略论——从“六书说”、“三书说”到“新六书说”

A Brief View on the Study of Chinese Character Type Theory——From “Six Types Theory”, “Three Types Theory” to “New Six Types Theory”
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着文字研究的深入,对汉字结构类型的分析也在不断地发展和完善。从传统"六书说"到"三书说",再到"新六书说"以及其他诸家理论,学者们从不同的角度对汉字进行分析,力图用新的理论框架来概括汉字的类型,争取做到逻辑更严密、系统性更强。文章拟选取以下几个代表性观点:"六书说",唐兰、陈梦家、裘锡圭等的"三书说"以及詹鄞鑫的"新六书说",通过分别评述各家理论的内容,来分析这几种理论的分类标准及其不足。 With the deepening of the study of Chinese characters, the analysis of the structure of Chinese characters is also constantly developing and improving. From the traditional "Six Types Theory" to "Three Types Theory", and then to "New Six Types Theory" and other theories, scholars have analyzed Chinese characters from different perspectives, trying to generalize the types of Chinese characters with a new theoretical framework, in order to create a more logical and systematic theory. The paper intends to select the following representative viewpoints:"Six Types Theory","Three Types Theory" of TANG Lan, CHEN Meng-jia, QIU Xi-gui and "New Six Types Theory" of ZHAN Yin-xin. By reviewing the contents of each theory, the classification criteria and deficiencies of these theories are analyzed.
作者 巴哲 罗娜 BA Zhe;LUO Na(Research Center of Ancient Chinese Calligraphy and Painting, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou Zhejiang 310058,China;Pingxiang Museum, Pingxiang Jiangxi 337000,China)
出处 《萍乡学院学报》 2019年第2期82-85,共4页 Journal of Pingxiang University
关键词 汉字类型理论 六书说 三书说 分类标准 不足 Chinese Character Type Theory “Six Types Theory” “Three Types Theory” classification criteria deficiencies
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献15

共引文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部