期刊文献+

决策代价约简求解中的交叉验证策略 被引量:3

Cross-validation strategy in attribute reduction based on decision cost
下载PDF
导出
摘要 属性约简是粗糙集理论中的核心问题,其目的是剔除冗余属性以找到具有较好泛化能力的属性子集.在决策粗糙集理论中,决策代价经常被作为属性约简的约束条件.但值得注意的是,虽然基于决策代价的约简求解算法可以有效地降低训练样本集上的总决策代价,但其往往忽视了测试样本集上的总决策代价.为解决这一问题,利用交叉验证的基本思想,设计了以决策代价为约束条件的一种新的属性约简求解算法.在八个UCI数据集上的实验结果表明,相较于传统基于决策代价的约简求解算法,所提算法不仅能有效地降低训练集合和测试集合的总决策代价,而且找出的属性子集亦可以带来更好的分类性能。 Attribute reduction is a core problem in rough set theory,with its purpose of getting rid of redundant attributes to obtain a reduct with better generalized performance. In decision-theoretic rough set, the decision cost is frequently regarded as constraint of attribute reduction. However, it is worthy to notice that although the reduct obtained by the algorithm based on the consideration of decision cost can effectively reduce the decision cost of the training set, it may fails to effectively reduce the decision cost of the test set. To solve such problem,a new algorithm, based on the method of cross - validation, is designed through using the decision cost as constraint. The experimental result over eight UCI data sets show that compared with the traditional algorithm based on decision cost, the proposed algorithm not only reduces the decision cost of training set and the test set,but also brings better classification performance.
作者 张龙波 李智远 杨习贝 王怡博 Zhang Longbo;Li Zhiyuan;Yang Xibei;Wang Yibo(Kewen College,Jiangsu Normal University,Xuzhou,221116,China;School of Computer,Jiangsu University of Science and Technology,Zhenjiang,212003,China;School of Computer Science and Engineering,Southeast University,Nanjing,211189,China)
出处 《南京大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2019年第4期601-608,共8页 Journal of Nanjing University(Natural Science)
基金 国家自然科学基金(61572242,61502211,61503160)
关键词 决策粗糙集 属性约简 交叉验证 代价敏感 decision-theoretic rough set attribute reduction cross-validation cost-sensitive
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献92

  • 1赵文清,朱永利,高伟华.一个基于决策粗糙集理论的信息过滤模型[J].计算机工程与应用,2007,43(7):185-187. 被引量:15
  • 2PAWLAK Z. Rough sets [ J ]. International Journal of Computer and Information Science, 1982, 11 (5) : 341-356.
  • 3PAWLAK Z. Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data [ M ]. Boston : Kluwer Academic Publishers Press, 1991:90-166.
  • 4苗夺谦,李道国.粗糙集理论、算法及应用[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2008:176-235.
  • 5YAO Y Y. Decision-theoretic rough set models [ C]// YAO J,Lingras P, Wu W Z, et al. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Rough Sets and Knowledge Technology 2007, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4481. Heidelberg: Springer, 2007 : 1-12.
  • 6YAO Y Y, WONG S K M. A decision theoretic framework for approximating concepts [ J ]. International Journal of Man-machine Studies, 1992, 37(6) : 793-809.
  • 7YAO Y Y, WONG S K M, LINGRAS P. A decision-theoretic rough set model [ C ]//RAS Z W, ZEMANKOVA M, EMRICHM M L. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Methodologies for Intelligent Systems 1990. North-Holland : [ s. n. ] , 1990 : 17-25.
  • 8YAO Y Y. Probabilistic approaches to rough sets [ J ]. Expert Systems, 2003, 20 : 287-297.
  • 9AN Qiu-sheng,ZHU You-hong. Rough relational database and its development[ J]. Journal of Chongqing Universiey of Posts and Telecommunications (natural science edition) ,2009,21 (4) :474-478.
  • 10WONG S K M, ZIARKO W. Comparison of the probabilistic approximate classification and the fuzzy set model [J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1987, 21: 357-362.

共引文献66

同被引文献38

引证文献3

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部