期刊文献+

CEUS灌注模式鉴别诊断甲状腺良恶性结节 被引量:11

CEUS perfusion patterns in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨CEUS灌注模式鉴别诊断甲状腺良恶性结节的价值。方法回顾性分析111例甲状腺结节患者(111个结节)的颈部CEUS图像及临床资料,通过评价造影灌注模式判断结节的良恶性。以病理结果为最终诊断标准,评价CEUS对甲状腺良恶性结节的诊断效能。结果病理诊断甲状腺良性结节14例,恶性结节97例。CEUS诊断甲状腺结节良恶性的敏感度为92.78%(90/97),特异度64.29%(9/14),准确率89.19%(99/111),阳性预测值94.74%(90/95),阴性预测值56.25%(9/16)。结论 CEUS灌注模式对鉴别诊断甲状腺良恶性结节具有一定价值。 Objective To investigate the value of CEUS perfusion patterns in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules.Methods CEUS images and clinical data of 111 patients with thyroid nodules (111 nodules) were retrospectively analyzed.Benign and malignant nodules were diagnosed through evaluating their contrast perfusion patterns.Taken pathology as the final diagnostic criteria,the efficacy of CEUS in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules was evaluated.Results Totally 14 cases were diagnosed as benign nodules and 97 as malignant nodules.The sensitivity,specificity,accuracy,positive predictive value and negative predictive value of CEUS in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules were 92.78%(90/97),64.29%(9/14),89.19%(99/111),94.74%(90/95) and 56.25%(9/16),respectively.Conclusion CEUS perfusion patterns are valuable in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules.
作者 庞丽娜 秦伟栋 杨晓 谷芬 罗文 PANG Lina;QIN Weidong;YANG Xiao;GU Fen;LUO Wen(Department of Ultrasound,the First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University,Xi'an 710032,China;School of Basic Medical Sciences,Air Force Medical University,Xi'an 710032,China)
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2019年第7期989-992,共4页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(81671691) 西京医院学科助推计划自由探索项目(XJZT18MJ50)
关键词 甲状腺结节 超声检查 造影剂 诊断 鉴别 thyroid nodule ultrasonography contrast media diagnosis,differential
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献61

  • 1杨毅军,刘建民,王保春.癌组织VEGF表达与原发性肝细胞癌进展的关系研究(英文)[J].中国现代医学杂志,2005,15(17):2564-2566. 被引量:11
  • 2Khati N, Adamson T, Johnson K, et al. Ultrasound of the thyroid and para thyroid glands. Ultr~sound Q, 2003,19(5) : 162-176.
  • 3Deng J, Zhou P, Tian SM, et al. Comparison of diagnostic effica- cy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, acoustic radiation force im- pulse imaging, and their combined use in differentiating focal solidthyroid nodules. PLoS One, 2014,9(3):e90674.
  • 4Cantisani V, Consorti F, Guerrisi A, et al. Prospective compar- ative evaluation of quantitative elastosonography. Eur J Radiol, 2013(82) : 1892-1898.
  • 5Nemec U, Nemec SF, Novotny C, et al. Quantitative evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound after intravenous administration of a microbubble contrast agent for differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules: Assessment of diagnostic accuracy. Eur RadioI, 2012,22(6) : 1357-1365.
  • 6Khati N, Adamson T, Johnson K, et al. Ultrasound of the thy- roid and parathyroid glands. Ultrasound Q, 2003, 19 ( 5 ) : 162 176.
  • 7Chan B, Desser T, Medougall I, et al. Common and uncommon sonographic t'eatures of papillary thyroid carcinoma. J Ultra sound Med, 2003,22(9):1083 1090.
  • 8Frates M, Benson C, Charboneau J, et al. Management of thy- roid nodules detected at US: Society of Radiologists in Ultra- sound Consensus Conference Statement. Ultrasound Q, 2006,22 (18):239-240.
  • 9Dietrich CF, Ignee A, Hocke M, et al. Pitfalls and artefacts using contrast enhanced ultrasound. Z Gastroenterol, 2011,49 (3) :350-356.
  • 10Bartolotta TV, Midiri M, Galia M, et al. Qualitative and quan- titative evaluation of solitary thyroid nodules with contrast-en- hanced ultrasound: Initial results. Eur Radiol, 2006, 16 (10) : 2234-2241.

共引文献229

同被引文献111

引证文献11

二级引证文献80

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部