“三角诈骗”的法理质疑与实践批判

Criminal Law Theory Criticism and Reconstruction Jurisprudential Challenge againstsuspects and Practical Critique on“Triangle F fraud”

“三角诈骗”是一个伪命题。正像要证明一个人的父亲是个女人一样,其命题是根本不可能成立的。如果说,“三角诈骗”的观点和理论给中国的刑法理论带来了某种虚假的繁荣景象也值得欣赏的话,那么这种理论热闹之后能否得出理性的结论而又经得起证伪的质疑?这是中国刑法理论应该直面、必须思考的问题。如果说,“三角诈骗”给中国的刑法实践带来了快刀斩乱麻的“爽快”结果,那么这种没有坚实理论基础和理论自洽支撑的刑法结论,是否是中国刑法实践一种背离法律轨道的盲人骑瞎马现象?“三角诈骗”理论违背了最基本的刑事法律关系构造,违背了刑事司法实践应当遵守的“循名责实”、从形而上到形而下的操作原则,违背了刑法设定诈骗罪基本概念内在的规范要素和外在的认定要求。因此,从刑法基本理论的层面对其进行必要的质疑,从而在刑事司法实践的层面对其进行必要的批判,是我国刑法学的职责所在。

"Triangle fraud"is, in essence, a false proposition, which is against the identification of the crime of swindle. As it is impossible to prove that a man’s father is a woman. Nevertheless, we admit that the view and theory of "Triangle fraud"bring some kind of prosperity,which means a sort of phony fa?ade in my opinion, to the Chinese criminal theory. Still, lack of internal validity, we wonder whether the theory shall draw a rational conclusion,and the conclusion could stand up tests. It is an important issue that should be faced directly and thought by Chinese criminal theory. Nevertheless we admit that theory of "Triangle fraud"brings China criminal judicial practice with efficient and direct effect in handling relevant crimes. Still, lack of concept foundation of harmonious theory, we wonder whether this theory shall get china criminal law practice into chaos and a eyeless condition opposite to normal "law track". The theory of"Triangle fraud"violates not only the most basic structure of criminal legal relations,but also the basic principles of operation in judicial practice including requiring the reality to correspond to the definition and from metaphysical to metaphysical. In addition, it is also contrary to basic concepts of crime of fraud. Accordingly, the main content of article involves two aspects to discuss issues of "Triangle fraud". It is necessary to question the issue by the basic theory of criminal law and criticize the problem in the aspect of judicial practice.